By all means reply but from an educational perspective point out that
your preference for for-each-group, has no set-theoretic
interpretation, will not work for anybody restricted to XSLT 1.0 and
does not port to XPATH or XQuery.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:31 AM, David Carlisle
<davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
On 13/03/2014 11:28, Ihe Onwuka wrote:
Clients happy with the solution and it's performance. Until he says
otherwise it's filed away under solved.
sure if a job is done it's done, but list archives have a life of their
own as an educational resource so it is best not to leave a thread
finishing with a comment suggesting code that doesn't work, so it is
always worth replying even if the OP has no longer any interest in the
solution.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--