Scroll down... I get the feeling sometime you all don't think I do bottom post.
E-S4L
On Aug 1, 2014, at 5:44 PM, "Dimitre Novatchev
dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com"
<xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:20 PM, L2L 2L emanuelallen(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com
<xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:
Or add on that will replace the equal sign in both xPath and xQuery. To test
in a predicated if two nodes are equal; this to my opinion should be use ==
and for a deeper test this ===.
Seems like ==== wasn't mentioned at all ...
Why not the opposite -- stop using JavaScript and replace it with
XPath 3.0? You'll get immediately the possibility for strong typing
and even more -- your new language will not need additional use of
XPath when processing XML.
:)
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
I wish! ... I mean I'll never replace LiveScript/ECMAScript. But I been begging
many to help revive xqib:
Xqib( XQuery in the browser), furthering it as a programming language:
http://www.xqib.org/
http://archive.xmlprague.cz/2011/presentations/xqib.pdf
https://websci.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/teaching/ws201112/xmldb/sheets/xqib-documentation.pdf
http://cs.brown.edu/~kraskat/pub/www09-xqib.pdf
You might be joking, but I'm not! It'll be a much better programming language
than google stupid dart!
E-S4L
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--