On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Rushforth, Peter
peter(_dot_)rushforth(_at_)nrcan-rncan(_dot_)gc(_dot_)ca
<xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30/#xml-to-json-stylesheet
json support could be the motivation for us to upgrade to v 3 techniques.
Now that I am acquainted with JSONiq it wouldn't be enough to tempt me. At
one point I thought streaming would but I keep finding workarounds.
I wish the rest of the world would get off version 1.
I had to do some work on version 1 recently and I was surprised at how
tolerable the whole experience was. Ok I didn't have to do any aggressive
string handling or anything that required a recursive template but it
brought home how well designed the initial incarnation of the language was.
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--