Pfft, that's too easy ;)
What would be the solution in 2.0 then?
-----Original Message-----
From: Wendell Piez wapiez(_at_)wendellpiez(_dot_)com
<xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 2:49 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Ignoring quotation marks in grouping and sorting
Hi Michele,
Goodness (as my mother is apt to say), then why stay with 1.1 (which, in a
sense, never even actually existed)?
A solution is possible, in theory, under those rules, but many XSLT
2.0 or 3.0 solutions will be more elegant, concise and intelligible.
Suggest you try tweaking the version first to satisfy that the XSLT runs
equivalently, which it is likely to do.
Cheers, Wendell
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:46 PM Michele R Combs mrrothen(_at_)syr(_dot_)edu
<xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:
Which XSLT 1.1 processor is that, does it have any extension
function support for easier or more powerful string handling than
Xpath
1.0 provides?
I'm using Saxon9he at the moment.
Michele
--
Wendell Piez | wendell -dot- piez -at- nist -dot- gov |
http://www.wendellpiez.com pellucidliterature.org | github.com/wendellpiez |
gitlab.coko.foundation/wendell - pausepress.org
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--