On 22.07.2020 13:25, Dr. Roger L Costello costello(_at_)mitre(_dot_)org wrote:
Surprisingly, however, the overall time to train the XML-based neural network
was faster than the time to train the map-based neural network:
neural-network:train
XML-based:
average time (net/ms) = 1711.572
total time (net/ms) = 169,445.644
map-based:
average time (net/ms) = 3633.811
total time (net/ms) = 359,747.295
I don't understand how this could possibly happen.
Does the profile not reveal where the map based solution spends most of
the time?
Which Saxon version exactly is that?
It might matter to judge that if the internal implementation of maps in
Saxon has changed in different versions.
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--