This seems shorter/simpler:
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";>
<xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:strip-space elements="*"/>
<xsl:template match="node()|@*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()|@*"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="*[@width and not(preceding-sibling::*/@width)]">
<xsl:for-each-group select=
". | following-sibling::*[not(@width)][1]/preceding-sibling::*
[. >> current()]"
group-adjacent="name()">
<xsl:variable name="vSegment" select="current-group()"/>
<xsl:for-each-group select="$vSegment"
group-starting-with="*[not(preceding-sibling::*[1]/@width)
or
sum((preceding-sibling::*
[. >>
$vSegment[1]/preceding-sibling::*[1]])
/@width/number())
mod 100 eq 0]">
<block type="composite"><xsl:copy-of select="current-group()"/></block>
</xsl:for-each-group>
</xsl:for-each-group>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="*[@width and preceding-sibling::*[@width]]"/>
</xsl:stylesheet>
When applied on the provided source XML document:
<blocks>
<block id="i1">content</block>
<block id="i2" width="33">content</block>
<block id="i3" width="67">content</block>
<block id="i4" width="50">content</block>
<block id="i5" width="50">content</block>
<block id="i6" width="25">content</block>
<block id="i7" width="55">content</block>
<block id="i8" width="20">content</block>
<block id="i9">content</block>
</blocks>
the wanted result is produced:
<blocks>
<block id="i1">content</block>
<block type="composite">
<block id="i2" width="33">content</block>
<block id="i3" width="67">content</block>
</block>
<block type="composite">
<block id="i4" width="50">content</block>
<block id="i5" width="50">content</block>
</block>
<block type="composite">
<block id="i6" width="25">content</block>
<block id="i7" width="55">content</block>
<block id="i8" width="20">content</block>
</block>
<block id="i9">content</block>
</blocks>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 2:19 PM Christophe Marchand
cmarchand(_at_)oxiane(_dot_)com <
xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hello all !
A slide is divided as blocks. Usually, there is one bloc per line, but
sometimes, two or more blocks can be on one line, if their width sum is
100.
My input has non-grouped blocks, and I want my input group blocks per line.
Here is a sample input :
<blocks>
<block id="i1">content</block>
<block id="i2" width="33">content</block>
<block id="i3" width="67">content</block>
<block id="i4" width="50">content</block>
<block id="i5" width="50">content</block>
<block id="i6" width="25">content</block>
<block id="i7" width="55">content</block>
<block id="i8" width="20">content</block>
<block id="i9">content</block>
</blocks>
Here is the expected output :
<blocks>
<block id="i1">content</block>
<block type="composite">
<block id="i2" width="33">content</block>
<block id="i3" width="67">content</block>
</block>
<block type="composite">
<block id="i4" width="50">content</block>
<block id="i5" width="50">content</block>
</block>
<block type="composite">
<block id="i6" width="25">content</block>
<block id="i7" width="55">content</block>
<block id="i8" width="20">content</block>
</block>
<block id="i9">content</block>
</blocks>
I have no idea of which form of for-each-group I have to use...
Is a solution with two-pass where I first calculate cumulated width with
an accumulator, followed a group-end-with="@cumulative-width eq 100"
could be a correct solution ?
Best,
Christophe
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write
all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
Sanity is madness put to good use.
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--