Your notes in 10 and 11 are correct in that UAID should be replaced with
SDID, with one caveat. If you can't assume that the UAID is even an
identity, there is no reason to warn the reader that the UAID is
different from the From address or point it out.
The only cases where the handling mail system would want to follow the
Errata as currently written are when they have reason to believe that
the UAID is the responsible identity.
From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 11:10 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: Adkins, Michael; DKIM IETF WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
The few large cases are
1. Exceptions to the general rule
2. Useful only when backed with some out of band discussion about
How does (or should) this affect the proposed Errata specification?
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to