At 09:01 27-01-2009, Dave CROCKER wrote:
2. Add text about the use of i= stating that it's use for
beyond using d= and is MUST be based on additional knowledge of its creation
that is outside the specification.
I'm commenting on item 2 because of the RFC 2119 keyword. I don't
see how to implement a requirement based on the additional knowledge
as it may fall under local policy unless there is a mechanism for the
sender and receiver to exchange that information.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to