Dave CROCKER wrote:
If I'm understanding the exchange you two are having, I think it means
suggesting two changes to the draft Errata:
1. For 10 and 11, change UAID to be SDID.
2. Add text about the use of i= stating that it's use for assessment goes
beyond using d= and is MUST be based on additional knowledge of its creation
that is outside the specification.
Does this reflect what you two are implying?
I also think that makes sense.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html