On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Jeff Macdonald
<jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 04:14:02PM -0500, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
Signer does not necessarily have to equal sender for DKIM base. This
is one of the reasons I tend to fall into the "d=" camp.
Don't forget i= is also in control of the signer too. An author/sender
does not control it.
Which would kind of make it redundant?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html