IETF DKIM (date)
November 24, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 16:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?, Douglas Otis, 15:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?, Mark Delany, 14:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?, Douglas Otis, 13:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP and SPF, Stephen Farrell, 11:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Dave CROCKER, 11:07
- [ietf-dkim] SPF/DKIM complementary failure scenarios?, Dave CROCKER, 11:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] one more round of the inane mailing list argument, was DKIM Japan has been set up, Ian Eiloart, 10:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] one more round of the inane mailing list argument, was DKIM Japan has been set up, Stephen Farrell, 10:48
- [ietf-dkim] ADSP and SPF, Alessandro Vesely, 10:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Ian Eiloart, 09:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] one more round of the inane mailing list argument, was DKIM Japan has been set up, John R. Levine, 09:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Wietse Venema, 09:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Ian Eiloart, 05:25
November 23, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, John R. Levine, 11:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Ian Eiloart, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Tony Hansen, 08:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Scott Kitterman, 06:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Ian Eiloart, 06:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A comprehensive DKIM verification specification will not violate protocol layers., Charles Lindsey, 05:17
November 22, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, John R. Levine, 23:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A comprehensive DKIM verification specification will not violate protocol layers., Douglas Otis, 17:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Douglas Otis, 17:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Scott Kitterman, 17:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Dave CROCKER, 12:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Steve Atkins, 12:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Tsuneki Ohnishi, 11:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Alessandro Vesely, 03:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up, Hector Santos, 00:27
November 08, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, John R. Levine, 21:07
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 20:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, J.D. Falk, 19:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-00, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Alessandro Vesely, 11:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Scott Kitterman, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Hector Santos, 08:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Hector Santos, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Bill.Oxley, 08:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Alessandro Vesely, 06:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-00, Alessandro Vesely, 06:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Necessary Verifier Actions to mitigate exploitation of trust established through DKIM signatures., Charles Lindsey, 05:24
- [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue, Barry Leiba, 03:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-04, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:36
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 00:33
- [ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-00, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:02
November 04, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack, why RFC 5322 compliance is a fuzzy term, and what about malformed MIME structures?), Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The Total Solution is an Integrated One., Hector Santos, 14:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack, why RFC 5322 compliance is a fuzzy term, and what about malformed MIME structures?), Alessandro Vesely, 14:13
November 03, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Hector Santos, 22:58
- [ietf-dkim] The Total Solution is an Integrated One., Hector Santos, 21:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack.), Douglas Otis, 14:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack.), John R. Levine, 08:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack.), Alessandro Vesely, 08:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Charles Lindsey, 07:00
November 01, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility, John R. Levine, 21:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 18:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Douglas Otis, 17:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility, Hector Santos, 13:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility, Alessandro Vesely, 05:56