IETF Discussion (date)
December 30, 2005
- Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), John Leslie, 21:38
- Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc. (was: The Value of Reputation), Douglas Otis, 20:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:22
- RE: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: DomainKeys Identified Mail (dkim)), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:04
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 05:36
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Frank Ellermann, 03:17
- SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc. (was: The Value of Reputation), Frank Ellermann, 01:41
December 28, 2005
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Randy Presuhn, 13:43
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 10:16
- Re: The Value of Reputation, Douglas Otis, 09:46
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 09:29
- RE: Need to know the procedure, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 09:22
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Julian Reschke, 08:21
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 08:09
- Re: Need to know the procedure, Jari Arkko, 06:26
- Need to know the procedure, ChandraMohan, 06:14
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta, 06:07
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:30
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 03:25
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 03:23
- Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review:Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Hector Santos, 02:59
December 27, 2005
- Re: The Value of Reputation, Frank Ellermann, 18:41
- Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Douglas Otis, 11:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 08:49
- The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:36
- RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen, 07:46
December 24, 2005
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Nathaniel Borenstein, 20:39
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Ned Freed, 16:48
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tim Bray, 14:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Douglas Otis, 14:14
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 12:36
- ABNF Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 12:31
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:18
December 23, 2005
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta, 22:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Eric Rescorla, 19:20
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Ned Freed, 19:13
- RE: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:47
- [ietf-dkim] RE: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:21
- Re: More on the Secretariat Statement of Work (SOW), Spencer Dawkins, 17:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Nathaniel Borenstein, 15:30
- More on the Secretariat Statement of Work (SOW), Bernard Aboba, 13:55
- IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba, 10:42
- Review of draft-nir-ikev2-auth-lt-04.txt, Bernard Aboba, 10:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 08:57
- Accessibility was Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 07:54
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:50
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Frank Ellermann, 07:02
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta, 05:46
- Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 04:47
- Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Hadmut Danisch, 02:30
December 22, 2005
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 23:55
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 22:23
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 22:13
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Mark Delany, 21:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Timeframes & status for external consumption, Andrew Newton, 20:35
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Michael Thomas, 18:20
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin, 17:35
- Re: Pre-picking one solution, Douglas Otis, 15:58
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 15:15
- RE: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: DomainKeys Identified Mail) (dkim) {4.2}, Patrick Peterson, 14:45
- Re: Announcement: Notifications List, Keith Moore, 14:27
- RE: Announcement: Notifications List, Burger, Eric, 13:58
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin, 13:40
- Re: Pre-picking one solution, Frank Ellermann, 13:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 12:21
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Douglas Otis, 12:14
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton, 12:04
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton, 11:41
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 11:24
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Michael Thomas, 09:56
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore, 09:42
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 08:46
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Barry Leiba, 08:34
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 07:39
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Spencer Dawkins, 07:02
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 06:51
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Spencer Dawkins, 06:51
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore, 06:50
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Stephen Farrell, 06:42
- Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore, 06:32
- Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:49
- Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Pekka Savola, 01:44
- [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Cullen Jennings, 00:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 00:46
December 21, 2005
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Frank Ellermann, 22:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba, 21:16
- Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Frank Solensky, 19:25
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 17:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 17:01
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba, 16:40
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell, 15:22
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:47
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:42
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:41
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:35
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:26
- [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:24
- [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:15
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie, 12:47
- Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Bob Braden, 10:55
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 10:25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:01
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 09:33
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Tony Hansen, 07:09
- FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-03.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 06:42
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 06:40
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba, 06:20
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin, 04:26
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell, 01:54
- Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:32
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell, 01:20
- RE: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Yaakov Stein, 00:27
December 20, 2005
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton, 23:06
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 22:31
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Eric Rescorla, 22:29
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Sam Hartman, 20:03
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 19:51
- [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba, 19:11
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Paul Hoffman, 18:49
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 18:17
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Eric Rescorla, 18:06
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann, 17:59
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie, 17:50
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 16:52
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie, 16:35
- Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Dave Crocker, 15:57
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 15:49
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie, 15:27
- Re: MIME Question - Boundary Redefined, John C Klensin, 14:50
- Re: MIME Question - Boundary Redefined, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:47
- Re: MIME Question - Boundary Redefined, Keith Moore, 14:46
- MIME Question - Boundary Redefined, Carl Hester, 13:49
- shortsightedness of ARP or lack thereof, Keith Moore, 12:44
- Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Noel Chiappa, 12:37
- Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Bob Braden, 12:09
- RE: Announcement: Notifications List, David B Harrington, 11:17
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore, 10:41
- Re: Announcement: Notifications List, Keith Moore, 10:39
- RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:35
- Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Steven M. Bellovin, 09:30
- Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Keith Moore, 09:15
- Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Dave Crocker, 08:58
- Announcement: Notifications List, Burger, Eric, 08:35
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:31
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Brian E Carpenter, 06:28
December 19, 2005
- The DSN exploit, Douglas Otis, 19:18
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann, 15:53
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore, 14:52
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Sam Hartman, 14:49
- REOPENENED Call for Nominations, NomCom05, Ralph Droms, 14:40
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore, 14:11
- RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:55
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore, 13:28
- RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:10
- Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Keith Moore, 12:59
- Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Bernard Aboba, 10:44
- Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Brian E Carpenter, 02:03
- Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Sam Hartman, 00:18
December 16, 2005
- Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Sam Hartman, 18:46
- RE: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Gray, Eric, 16:35
- Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 16:14
- Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 10:22
- Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Marshall Eubanks, 09:37
- Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Bill Fenner, 09:27
- Re: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 09:00
- Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 04:38
- Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 04:08
- Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 03:56
- Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Peter Dambier, 03:35
- Re: Last call IETF experiments, Brian E Carpenter, 00:33
December 14, 2005
- Re: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann, 19:30
- IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Ray Pelletier, 17:21
- Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Hadmut Danisch, 15:14
- Re: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Douglas Otis, 15:06
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann, 14:54
- Re: Last call IETF experiments, Scott Bradner, 14:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments, Sam Hartman, 14:21
- SES vs BATV, Douglas Otis, 13:22
- Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 11:00
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 11:00
- SES or BATV (was: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann, 11:00
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 09:42
- Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Frank Ellermann, 08:55
- Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Peter Dambier, 08:25
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 08:09
- FW: [blilly(_at_)erols(_dot_)com: Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry], Michelle Cotton, 07:23
- Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Chris Lilley, 07:22
- How security could benefit from high volume spam, Hadmut Danisch, 07:17
- RE: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, IANA, 07:17
December 13, 2005
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 14:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Keith Moore, 13:04
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 12:13
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 11:26
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 09:15
December 11, 2005
- Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Joseph Salowey, 22:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments (was: Appeal ....), John C Klensin, 17:57
- [reminder] 8th IPv6 Interoperability Test Event, Yukiyo Akisada, 17:51
- [spf-discuss] Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann, 16:35
- [spf-discuss] Last call IETF experiments (was: Appeal ....), Frank Ellermann, 16:06
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 13:35
- Fwd: Need for a rebuild [was I-D file formats and internationalization], Eduardo Mendez, 10:13
- Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Bruce Lilly, 08:50
- Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Bruce Lilly, 07:51
December 10, 2005
- Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, wayne, 20:42
- Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:37
- Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, John C Klensin, 14:13
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 11:04
- Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, wayne, 10:59
- Re: declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Frank Ellermann, 05:05
- Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, John Levine, 02:41
- Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Brian E Carpenter, 02:11
December 09, 2005
- Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, wayne, 17:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 17:42
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 16:13
- Report: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 16:07
- Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Dave Crocker, 15:55
- Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, John Levine, 15:26
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Bob Braden, 14:45
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 13:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 13:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 12:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 12:25
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 12:18
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 12:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 11:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 10:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 10:51
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 08:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 08:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 08:10
- Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 07:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 06:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 06:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 06:42
- Re: Any Final Comments on the IETF Trust, Scott Bradner, 06:29
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 06:04
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 05:37
- Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:40
- Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 00:44
- Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Pekka Savola, 00:03
December 08, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Pekka Savola, 23:50
- Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Lucy E. Lynch, 20:21
- unsubscribe, 高明军, 20:07
- Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:42
- Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 15:45
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 15:15
- The Trust Agreement Proposal, Bob Hinden, 15:01
- Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Lucy E. Lynch, 14:46
- Any Final Comments on the IETF Trust, Lucy E. Lynch, 14:26
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Sam Hartman, 12:31
- Re: [IAOC] Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 12:14
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 12:09
- The Trust Agreement Proposal, John C Klensin, 12:09
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Lucy E. Lynch, 11:48
- Re: [IAOC] Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 10:30
- Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Brian E Carpenter, 10:30
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 10:29
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Lucy E. Lynch, 10:10
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 09:56
- Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Frank Ellermann, 09:47
- IAB appeal (was: off-topic?), Frank Ellermann, 09:03
- Re: off-topic? [was Re: Examples of translated RFCs], Masataka Ohta, 08:48
- Re: Reply to IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 08:06
- Re: off-topic? [was Re: Examples of translated RFCs], Doug Ewell, 08:06
- Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:58
- Definition of SFTP ..., Noël, Richard, 06:45
- IETF Trust last call, Elwyn Davies, 05:08
- Reply to IETF Trust Consensus Call, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:57
December 07, 2005
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Sam Hartman, 22:00
- Re: off-topic?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:24
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 13:56
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Tim Bray, 12:59
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Erik Huizer, 06:26
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 05:58
- Re: off-topic?, Frank Ellermann, 05:40
- off-topic? [was Re: Examples of translated RFCs], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 03:26
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Frank Ellermann, 02:32
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 01:50
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Doug Ewell, 00:50
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 00:00
December 06, 2005
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Yaakov Stein, 23:24
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Doug Ewell, 23:14
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Douglas Otis, 19:07
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Frank Ellermann, 16:20
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 16:08
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, codewarrior, 15:38
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 15:18
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 14:08
- Re: I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:03
- RE: Examples of translated RFCs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 09:59
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Marshall Eubanks, 09:57
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 09:55
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:40
- RE: Examples of translated RFCs, Gray, Eric, 09:12
- RE: Examples of translated RFCs, Gray, Eric, 09:07
- RE: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Gray, Eric, 09:05
- RE: Examples of translated RFCs, Nelson, David, 09:02
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 07:20
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 06:56
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 06:52
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:54
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 05:15
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 04:46
- Re: I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Brian E Carpenter, 03:13
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 02:50
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 02:47
- Re: Examples of translated RFCs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:36
- Examples of translated RFCs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:37
December 05, 2005
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Francis Dupont, 13:23
- I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 12:32
- RE: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:42
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Gray, Eric, 09:37
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Marshall Eubanks, 08:33
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 08:31
- Re: draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, william(at)elan.net, 08:30
- Re: draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:09
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Brian E Carpenter, 08:06
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 08:00
- Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 07:56
- RE: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:31
- The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 07:21
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Marshall Eubanks, 07:18
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Brian E Carpenter, 07:04
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Brian E Carpenter, 06:58
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Brian E Carpenter, 06:57
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 05:54
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Jeffrey Hutzelman, 05:52
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Jeffrey Hutzelman, 05:47
- draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, Daniel Feenberg, 05:43
December 04, 2005
- Re: draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, Douglas Otis, 19:21
- Re: draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, Sam Hartman, 14:33
- FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-02.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 12:23
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Paul Hoffman, 10:25
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Douglas Otis, 09:43
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Henrik Levkowetz, 04:25
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Henrik Levkowetz, 04:20
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Doug Ewell, 01:00
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Yaakov Stein, 00:24
December 02, 2005
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 23:03
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Ted Faber, 22:58
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 20:06
- Final Update - IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 15:05
- IETF vs. global politics (was RE: I-D file formats and internationalization), Nelson, David, 13:57
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:01
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Ted Lemon, 10:59
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Mark Andrews, 10:54
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Ted Faber, 10:26
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Noel Chiappa, 07:56
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 07:56
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 06:24
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Julian Reschke, 06:18
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:56
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 05:39
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 05:34
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 05:25
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:08
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 04:19
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 04:08
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Henrik Levkowetz, 01:54
December 01, 2005
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Tim Bray, 18:46
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, John C Klensin, 17:06
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:00
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Gray, Eric, 16:25
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Keith Moore, 16:24
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Keith Moore, 16:22
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:12
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Gray, Eric, 16:01
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Douglas Otis, 15:57
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Robert Sayre, 15:39
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Keith Moore, 15:30
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Doug Royer, 15:27
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:23
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Keith Moore, 15:10
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:55
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Tim Bray, 14:37
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Keith Moore, 13:18
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:33
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Tim Bray, 12:28
- Re: ASCII art, Tim Bray, 12:14
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Douglas Otis, 11:04
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], David W. Hankins, 10:36
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Paul Hoffman, 09:36
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], David W. Hankins, 08:13
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Robert Sayre, 08:04
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Robert Sayre, 08:01
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], David W. Hankins, 08:01
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:05
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 07:04
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:00
- RE: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 06:34
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Pekka Savola, 06:05
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Douglas Otis, 01:16