At 17:32 23/01/2006, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Thus in your opinion you tolerate the behavior where people contact
your boss for actions you take personally (IETF is on personal basis
not on business basis, at least in theory) on a public forum!?
I do not want to add to the triggered DoS. I only suggest you do as
Marhall did: read the archives and speak the truth. I obviously
forgive John Cowan. But when you use your corporate mail to harass
someone, his clients find it in Google. He can lose some, as we did
or they can call your corporation. And you need help, what I
provided; and he needs it to stop, what I obtained. I am surprised no
one realises that a PR action is a license to publicly defame a
person, terminate projects and kill small businesses or non-profits.
That has consequences on him and on the people and R&D he subsidises
(I am my own boss for 20 years). People may also get ashamed or feel
stupid further on.
Should RFC 3066 be applied and the IANA manage, publish and control
the ietf-languages(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no mailing list, appealing on competent
local experts from everywhere, on an equal no harassment lingual
opportunity basis, you would have never heard of me - except through
my currently delayed projects. But RFC 3066 Bis cleaning, Tunis
covenant, officially floated possible IANA sale start bettering the
things. I won. Bickering and bittering will not change that on the
long range. It should be time for everyone to accept the open use implications.
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf