Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(dr

Ned Freed wrote:
> > For the record, things like IANA considerations sections should be
> > required of I-Ds, even if to say that there aren't any.  A single such
> > section gathering several such sub-sections should do ("Misc
> > Considerations.  This draft has no IANA considerations.  This draft has
> > no ...").
> I have already explained why I think this is a Very Bad Idea.
Agreed. In my experience, the IANA does not want the I-D to contain a
section entitled "IANA Considerations" if there are no actions required
of the IANA.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf