because, in the end, ULA (whichever flavor it is) leads to
IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT.
I prefer losing some bytes in all my packets between locations using
different ULA-D prefixes to get an underlying VPN / tunneling
infrastructure. This allows me to keep things flat, i.e. pure routing.
itojun, let's just stop using the 3 letters word. It does not exist
anymore.
is it ULA, NAT, VPN or all of them :-)
itojun
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf