ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)

2007-09-18 22:00:29
Thus spake "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch(_at_)muada(_dot_)com>
On 18-sep-2007, at 17:50, Jeroen Massar wrote:
I don't think ULA-C makes sense. We have a RIR system in
place. These RIRs are supposed to provide address space
for people/organizations who can justify a need for that
address space.

That's like selling train tickets at the airport. Except for the fraction of a promille of all IP users that have their own portable address space, RIRs don't even talk to IP users who are
_connected_  to the internet, let alone those who aren't! It just
doesn't make sense to involve the RIRs here.

The RIRs talk to anyone who submits the appropriate forms. They'll even help you fill out the forms if you can give them enough information to do so. You could even do it by phone or snail mail if you've been living under a rock and still don't have Internet service.

ARIN policy, at least, explicitly allows for direct assignments to end sites even if they're not connected -- just like IANA assigned Class A/B/C blocks to disconnected orgs back in the good ol' days.

S

Stephen Sprunk         "God does not play dice."  --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723         "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>