IETF Discussion (date)
June 30, 2008
- Re: Subscriber List Damage, Simon Josefsson, 23:35
- Re: Subscriber List Damage, Glen, 19:30
- Re: Subscriber List Damage, Eric Rescorla, 18:36
- Re: Subscriber List Damage, Glen, 17:37
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews, 17:14
- Re: Subscriber List Damage, Michael Thomas, 15:48
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-05, Ben Campbell, 14:17
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Philip Guenther, 12:55
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 12:30
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 12:04
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:18
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker, 07:28
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 07:20
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 07:15
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Ralph Droms, 07:12
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Spencer Dawkins, 07:08
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Eric Gray, 06:52
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 06:50
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 06:44
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 06:41
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 05:49
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin, 05:44
June 29, 2008
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 23:43
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 20:29
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bill Manning, 19:47
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker, 19:33
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 17:55
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Keith Moore, 17:47
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Randy Presuhn, 17:46
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker, 17:32
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker, 17:31
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Jari Arkko, 16:52
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Randy Presuhn, 16:45
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:50
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine, 13:24
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 12:53
June 28, 2008
- Subscriber List Damage, Glen, 22:03
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, SM, 21:38
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Brian E Carpenter, 15:22
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 13:58
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann, 00:15
June 27, 2008
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Baptista, 20:30
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, C. M. Heard, 18:55
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Lawrence Conroy, 17:28
- SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker, 16:24
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 16:19
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Brian E Carpenter, 15:09
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:40
- Outage Update, Alexa Morris, 14:38
- RE: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:50
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Abley, 13:35
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 12:59
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Marshall Eubanks, 12:44
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-norm-revised-05.txt, Brian Adamson, 12:37
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST, Eric Gray, 12:36
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Russ Housley, 12:35
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Lakshminath Dondeti, 12:34
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Lakshminath Dondeti, 12:33
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, SM, 12:25
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, SM, 12:09
- SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker, 12:03
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, David Conrad, 11:52
- Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Marshall Eubanks, 11:43
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Keith Moore, 11:20
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Julian Reschke, 11:18
- RE: SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Eric Gray, 10:50
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), SM, 10:48
- SHOULD vs MUST case sensitivity, Dave Crocker, 10:34
June 26, 2008
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:53
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends, Paul Hoffman, 19:38
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends, Frank Ellermann, 19:08
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), SM, 18:36
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), John C Klensin, 16:36
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Brian E Carpenter, 16:25
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin, 12:15
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, SM, 11:25
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Dave Cridland, 11:18
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Lakshminath Dondeti, 04:43
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Lakshminath Dondeti, 04:38
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Lakshminath Dondeti, 04:36
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker, 02:52
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker, 02:51
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker, 02:50
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker, 02:49
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Dave Crocker, 02:48
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Dave Crocker, 02:47
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Lakshminath Dondeti, 02:29
June 25, 2008
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), John C Klensin, 16:38
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETFand IESG trends), Spencer Dawkins, 14:52
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Robert Sparks, 14:51
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Brian E Carpenter, 14:42
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Jari Arkko, 11:30
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Dean Willis, 11:10
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Scott Brim, 11:02
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, John C Klensin, 10:38
- RE: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETFand IESG trends), Ross Callon, 10:21
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Scott Brim, 10:03
- Re: Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Melinda Shore, 09:19
- Qualitative Analysis of IETF and IESG trends (Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends), Lakshminath Dondeti, 08:45
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John Levine, 07:41
- Re: Measuring IETF and IESG trends (Was: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis), Marshall Eubanks, 06:56
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Fred Baker, 05:54
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Spencer Dawkins, 05:49
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, John C Klensin, 05:24
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Scott Brim, 04:59
- Measuring IETF and IESG trends (Was: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis), Jari Arkko, 04:36
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Julian Reschke, 03:02
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Stewart Bryant, 02:47
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Fred Baker, 02:38
- Re: Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 00:59
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:32
June 24, 2008
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 15:32
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST, Frank Ellermann, 14:27
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 13:36
- Re: Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table, Randy Presuhn, 13:28
- Re: Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:17
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-10.txt, Satoshi Futemma, 13:16
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-10.txt, Black_David, 13:15
- Operation permissions on Read-Only objects in a table, Aditya JAIN, 13:13
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07), Joe Abley, 11:52
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07), Dave Cridland, 10:13
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Bernard Aboba, 08:33
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 07:46
- IETF 75 Announced!, Ray Pelletier, 04:31
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:42
June 23, 2008
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Bernard Aboba, 19:42
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 14:36
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Pete Resnick, 13:39
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin, 13:01
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin, 13:00
- Re: 64bit time_t, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:57
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 12:52
- Re: RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Melinda Shore, 10:15
- RE: RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo), 09:59
- RE: [Geopriv] Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07, Dawson, Martin, 09:03
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 08:42
- RE: RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Stephen Kent, 07:38
- Re: RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Melinda Shore, 06:36
- Re: RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Hannes Tschofenig, 05:49
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Cridland, 03:51
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-arifumi-6man-rfc3484-revise-00, Arifumi Matsumoto, 02:52
- Re: 64bit time_t, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:41
June 21, 2008
- RE: RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Dan Wing, 23:49
- Re: 64bit time_t, John Levine, 18:26
- Re: 64bit time_t, Randy Presuhn, 12:03
- Re: 64bit time_t, Doug Ewell, 11:47
- 64bit time_t, Chad Giffin, 11:38
- RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Chad Giffin, 11:29
- RE: RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Chad Giffin, 11:08
- RE: RNET: Random Network Endpoint Technology, Chad Giffin, 10:53
- Re: SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07), Eric Rescorla, 10:32
- SHOULD vs MUST (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07), Lawrence Conroy, 06:31
June 20, 2008
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07, TSG, 19:08
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07, Eric Rescorla, 12:53
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Randy Presuhn, 12:06
- Re: IANA-registered vendor subtree (RFC2244), Alexey Melnikov, 11:36
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 11:23
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Debbie Garside, 08:44
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Debbie Garside, 08:42
June 19, 2008
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, SM, 23:41
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:54
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Robert Elz, 15:18
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ted Hardie, 14:58
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Eliot Lear, 13:33
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann, 12:52
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Pete Resnick, 12:23
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ted Hardie, 11:34
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin, 11:24
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 10:58
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Debbie Garside, 10:51
- Re: [AVT] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-10.txt, Satoshi Futemma, 10:49
- RE: RNET: Randon Network Endpoint Technology, Dan Wing, 09:57
- RNET: Randon Network Endpoint Technology, Chad Giffin, 09:49
- Re: ConneXions archive, Mirjam Kuehne, 05:48
June 18, 2008
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Russ Housley, 19:43
- ConneXions archive, Ole Jacobsen, 18:08
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ned Freed, 15:52
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Cridland, 15:09
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Spencer Dawkins, 14:48
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Ralph Droms, 14:28
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann, 14:00
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Cridland, 13:24
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Cridland, 13:22
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Robert Elz, 11:58
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann, 11:34
- Re: Limits of RFC 2606, Frank Ellermann, 11:08
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Robert Elz, 11:02
- Re: IESG rejecting purple documents on Wednesdays, Bernard Aboba, 10:44
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Debbie Garside, 10:09
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Debbie Garside, 10:08
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Bob Hinden, 09:45
- Limits of RFC 2606 (Was: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:01
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Simon Josefsson, 04:19
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Harald Alvestrand, 00:06
June 17, 2008
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Marshall Eubanks, 17:03
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, LB, 14:10
- example TLH (was: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis), Frank Ellermann, 13:42
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, TSG, 13:29
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Eliot Lear, 13:18
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Marshall Eubanks, 12:39
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Pete Resnick, 12:33
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin, 12:32
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Scott O. Bradner, 12:28
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Spencer Dawkins, 12:27
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 12:08
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Robert Elz, 12:01
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Steven M. Bellovin, 11:55
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Marshall Eubanks, 11:45
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Debbie Garside, 10:34
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-10.txt, Black_David, 10:33
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Lakshminath Dondeti, 10:08
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Fred Baker, 09:51
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Fred Baker, 09:43
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Lakshminath Dondeti, 09:26
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, David Kessens, 06:04
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, eburger, 05:27
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Simon Josefsson, 02:30
June 16, 2008
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Brian Dickson, 23:37
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker, 23:11
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker, 18:51
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Dave Crocker, 18:50
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Frank Ellermann, 15:56
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin, 15:40
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Brian E Carpenter, 14:43
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, TSG, 14:42
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, TSG, 14:41
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Robert Elz, 12:14
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, John C Klensin, 09:39
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Tony Hansen, 08:32
- Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Pete Resnick, 08:21
- RE: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Eric Gray, 07:28
June 04, 2008
- Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminally prosecutable in nature..., Fred Baker, 09:52
- Re: Problems drawing up a draft for independant submission, Joe Abley, 09:31
- Re: Problems drawing up a draft for independant submission, Frank Ellermann, 09:14
- Problems drawing up a draft for independant submission, Chad Giffin, 09:04
- RFC Editor Structure, Olaf Kolkman, 04:47
June 03, 2008
- Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminally prosecutable in nature..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 21:32
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Brian E Carpenter, 21:23
- Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may becriminallyprosecutable in nature..., TS Glassey, 21:20
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Pekka Savola, 20:55
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Joe Abley, 20:08
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Brian E Carpenter, 14:42
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Suresh Krishnan, 12:15
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Ted Hardie, 11:13
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Suresh Krishnan, 10:57
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Tony Finch, 10:38
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Michael StJohns, 10:30
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Tony Finch, 09:47
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Michael StJohns, 08:21
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Scott Brim, 07:58
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Arifumi Matsumoto, 07:44
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Simon Josefsson, 06:38
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Tony Finch, 06:34
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Simon Josefsson, 06:30
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Ralph Droms, 06:14
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Simon Josefsson, 05:56
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Thomas Narten, 05:45
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure (The E.164 to Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Application for Infrastructure ENUM) to Informational RFC, Olaf Kolkman, 02:02
June 02, 2008
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Leo Vegoda, 23:28
- Re: Proposal - Create a Time Centric or Digital Evidence Centric Area., Eric Burger, 17:39
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Mark Andrews, 17:04
- Re: RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece, Paul Hoffman, 15:28
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Tony Finch, 14:54
- Re: RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece, Frank Ellermann, 14:38
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Brian E Carpenter, 14:26
- Re: RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece, Paul Hoffman, 13:37
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Joel M. Halpern, 12:52
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Ted Hardie, 12:10
- RE: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminallyprosecutable in nature..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:53
- I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminally prosecutable in nature..., TS Glassey, 10:30
- Re: RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece, Bob Braden, 10:08
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-norm-revised-04.txt, Brian Adamson, 09:55
- Re: RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece, John C Klensin, 09:42
- Re: RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece, SM, 08:55
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Mark Andrews, 07:27
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, marcelo bagnulo braun, 07:08
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Mark Andrews, 06:55
- Re: Proposal - Create a Time Centric or Digital Evidence Centric Area., Peter Sylvester, 04:48
- RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece, John C Klensin, 03:55
- RE: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 02:57
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, SM, 02:17
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, marcelo bagnulo braun, 01:52
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Mark Andrews, 00:17
- Re: RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Pekka Savola, 00:00
June 01, 2008
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, SM, 23:21
- RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9, Mark Andrews, 21:57
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, Frank Ellermann, 21:06
- Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers, SM, 19:59
- Re: Proposal - Create a Time Centric or Digital Evidence Centric Area., Eric Burger, 13:37