ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

2008-07-02 09:54:42
In article 
<Pine(_dot_)GSO(_dot_)4(_dot_)63(_dot_)0807020927290(_dot_)12027(_at_)pita(_dot_)cisco(_dot_)com>
 you write:
Paul,

But it is still the case that an application for say .local would need 
to go through some review process (regardless of price) which would 
include input from the IETF ICANN rep.

More likely from the SSAC, which would be even better.

In any event, as I said before, although there's a lot not to like
about ICANN, the chances of them doing anything technically
destructive remains low.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet 
for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>