ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

2008-07-07 14:57:25
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:13:47PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:01:30PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com 
wrote:
If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works
reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least
    ^^^^^^^^
a hint of merit to your argument.   e.g. an actual email address or
URL that uses a single-label domain name.
zod:~$ ping hk
PING hk (203.119.2.28): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms
% ping hk.
PING hk (203.119.2.28) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=265 ms
64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=265 ms

Not very reliably, I think.  :-)

Sorry, I cut and paste the wrong example.  What I had meant to cut and
paste:

5% ping hk
PING hk.ibm.com (9.190.250.244) 56(84) bytes of data.
...

                                                        - Ted

With your hk.ibm.com example, do you have any search lines in your /etc/resolv.conf file that would be automatically appending?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>