Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:13:47PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:01:30PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com
If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works
reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least
a hint of merit to your argument. e.g. an actual email address or
URL that uses a single-label domain name.
zod:~$ ping hk
PING hk (18.104.22.168): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms
% ping hk.
PING hk (126.96.36.199) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (188.8.131.52): icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=265 ms
64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (184.108.40.206): icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=265 ms
Not very reliably, I think. :-)
Sorry, I cut and paste the wrong example. What I had meant to cut and
5% ping hk
PING hk.ibm.com (220.127.116.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
With your hk.ibm.com example, do you have any search lines in your
/etc/resolv.conf file that would be automatically appending?
Ietf mailing list