ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

2008-07-07 15:50:51
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:25:31PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:04:31PM -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:44:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, 
moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com wrote:
also...  
% dig version.bind txt chaos @128.9.160.161
;; ANSWER SECTION:
version.bind.           0S CHAOS TXT    "9.4.2"

    so - recent resolver code does this trick.

Fair enough.  Perils of working for ISI, I suppose - modern
infrastructure.

Not to argue with someone who's forgotten more about DNS than I know,
but I was able to get it to work from zig.usc.edu as well. On zig (a
Linux box talking to an ambiguously identified "USC Bind 9x" server)
ping needed the trailing dot on hk. to work.  And by "got it to work, I
mean "typed ping".  I also had no trouble on a FreeBSD machine talking
to bind 9.3.3.  It works at home, too, but that's also a 9.4.2 bind.

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG

        so... the point i was tryig to make was/is:

        simple queries only help if you know:
                ) the version of software running on your caching server
                and
                ) the search list defined by your "resolv.conf" 

        zig.usc.edu,
        boreas.isi.edu,
        luna-base.org,
        ep.net,
        lcs.mit.edu,
        comcast.net,

        all run slightly different caching code and variable search lists.

        you, me, Ted, Keith, John, et.al.  are going to see -slightly- different
        responses  when presenting our individual local caching servers with
        non-terminated DNS strings.

        Japp and Karl both hinted at this problem - local policy  is the worst 
policy,
        except for all the others.  Your local DNS admin can (and occasionally 
they do)
        toss you into a random walled-DNS garden that has only a passing 
similarity to
        what you think of as the "Internet".   
http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac032.pdf
        is illustrative.  

-- 
--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>