On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Samuel Weiler wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> I really don't understand why Dean should be blocked from
Dean is the subject of a PR Action; Henrik needs no other reason to
apply the blocking and, if there is a reason or triggering event
(which seems likely), he needn't disclose it to Dean or to this list.
In the general case, I also see no harm in the blocking: those aliases
are for convenience, and it's easy to expand them using public
sources. Blocking their use doesn't meaingfully hamper IETF
Sam, not disagreeing with anything you are saying here but none of
this helps me understand why Dean should be blocked. [Note, I'm not
saying this blocking is right or wrong, just that I don't understand
why]. Should someone who is subject of a PR action just be
automatically blocked from all IETF lists?
Ietf mailing list