-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I do not debate the utility to the Nomcom of this change.
I believe it comes with a cost, and I do not agree that it is a simple
decision. I do not agree that the Nomcom is the only party here worth
consideration.
Joe
Stephen Kent wrote:
Joe,
Having served on NOMCOM more than once, and having been solicited for
inputs every year, I much prefer publishing the names of folks have
consented to be considered for IAB and IESG positions. The addition of
"ringers" to lists that are sent out (to hide the identities of the true
candidates) wastes the time of a lot of folks who are asked to provide
feedback on these non-candidates. It also means that someone who is a
real candidate may not receive feedback because people assume the
individual is a ringer!
Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkoxo8kACgkQE5f5cImnZrtsewCeLOjG5iIYRgfDCbSHxiVw/GE1
ZFUAn39X8Z3OPmAm8lSFgdP/2AAwtPjY
=8ZBh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf