-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If everyone knew, there would be more lobbying since there would be more
people participating. I doubt the direct or secret-list lobbying would
wane much as a result.
I don't think you'll get any more lobbying than you get now. The point
of the nomcom being people, rather than a simple vote, is to filter out
this sort of lobbying, because it's going to happen either way.
The question is: Is the nomcom better at filtering out lobbying, or
failures to get effective feedback because we're trying to keep
something "secret?" After serving on the nomcom three times, I can
easily say more feedback is better, and I'd rather work at weeding out
lobbying--which I must do anyway--than to try and fix lack of feedback,
or make "educated guesses."
:-)
Russ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkoyhMwACgkQER27sUhU9OSaDwCeLDMpVbow0eu1KL4pTjW1QV+i
BxQAn3wRm989N6YmWNivYmcnGoNJ+G9g
=YxIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf