On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:07 PM, Ed Juskevicius wrote:
I might be talked into agreeing with most of your points, but I am not
convinced that "if you buy a day pass, you should certainly be nomcom
eligible."
How about replacing "should certainly" with "may"?
How about "Two day passes are equivalent to one full meeting" for
nomcom eligibility ?
Note that that would imply that a person with only day passes would
not be eligible.
Regards
Marshall
Regards,
Ed J.
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf
Of
Danny McPherson
Sent: March-24-10 10:00 PM
To: The IETF
Subject: On Day Passes..
Figured I'd be the one to kick a thread off on this fascinating
topic :-)
I like the idea of day passes, it's not just about the cost of the
day pass
and all it avails, if someone is only coming to the IETF meeting for
a day
(e.g., they only want a day pass because they have a time
constraining day
job or actual fiscal constraints), then why should they be required
to pay a
fee to subsidize meeting costs for the entire week?
The work happens on the mailing lists, consensus is judged on the
mailing
list, and remote participation is encouraged as well.
And if you buy a day pass, you should certainly be nomcom eligible.
-danny
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf