Raph: At 4:49 PM 2/14/96, Raph Levien wrote:
MOSS is mostly cryptographically sound.
In fact, MOSS is too flexible. In most circumstances, signatures should be performed before encryption. MOSS allows people to sign ciphertext, by putting a multipart/encrypted inside a multipart/signed. The MOSS specification offers no warnings about this "feature." Russ
Previous by Date: | *** Happy New Lunar Year ***, Ronald Wiplinger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols, Ned Freed |
Previous by Thread: | Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols, Mark S Feldman |
Next by Thread: | Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols, Ned Freed |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |