SPF Discuss (date)
October 28, 2003
- Re: multiple SPF TXT records, wayne, 22:19
- Re: multiple SPF TXT records, Meng Weng Wong, 22:02
- Re: SPF syntax errors, wayne, 20:34
- Re: multiple SPF TXT records, wayne, 20:12
- Mechanism extension for TLS, lee-spf, 17:00
- Re: rationale for the explanation directive, Jasper Wallace, 15:55
- Re: let the publishing begin ... soon, Jasper Wallace, 15:26
- spfd lets you test SPF queries, Meng Weng Wong, 12:50
- RE: SPF syntax errors, Marc, 12:14
- Re: SPF syntax errors, Meng Weng Wong, 11:56
- Re: SPF syntax errors, Meng Weng Wong, 11:54
- Re: let the publishing begin ... soon, wayne, 11:19
- Re: rationale for the explanation directive, Meng Weng Wong, 11:18
- rationale for the explanation directive, Meng Weng Wong, 11:16
- Re: Bounce loops, Roy Badami, 11:04
- Re: Bounce loops, Rob Kaper, 11:02
- RE: let the publishing begin ... soon, Marc, 10:54
- Re: SPF syntax errors, wayne, 09:47
- Re: Bounce loops, B. Johannessen, 09:31
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 09:19
- exp field, Andy, 09:17
- Re: Bounce loops, Meng Weng Wong, 09:16
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, wayne, 09:16
- Bounce loops, Roy Badami, 09:12
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, wayne, 09:03
- Re: new draft RFC 90% done., wayne, 07:51
October 27, 2003
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, Eric Helfgott, 23:46
- RE: lookups by macro expansion, L Carver, 23:23
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, Meng Weng Wong, 22:21
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, Eric S. Raymond, 21:50
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, Aredridel, 20:57
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, Philip Gladstone, 20:53
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, Roy Badami, 18:05
- RE: let the publishing begin ... soon, Marc, 14:55
- Re: Waving a flag for version 1, Phil Howard, 13:34
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, Eric S. Raymond, 11:52
- Re: lookups by macro expansion, Meng Weng Wong, 11:03
- RE: SPF reporting mechanism, Dustin Trammell, 11:03
- lookups by macro expansion, Roy Badami, 10:57
- Re: Mail::SPF::Query 1.7pre1 released, Justin Mason, 10:53
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 10:44
- RE: SPF reporting mechanism, Dustin Trammell, 10:41
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 10:27
- RE: SPF reporting mechanism, Dustin Trammell, 10:23
- lookups by macro expansion, Meng Weng Wong, 10:23
- Re: Mail::SPF::Query 1.7pre1 released, Meng Weng Wong, 08:46
- Re: revisiting the LocalPart mechanism, Philip Gladstone, 08:19
- Re: Mail::SPF::Query 1.7pre1 released, Graham Murray, 06:44
October 26, 2003
- Mail::SPF::Query 1.7pre1 released, Meng Weng Wong, 22:35
- Re: revisiting the LocalPart mechanism, Aredridel, 18:57
- "pi" provides draft-01 compatibility, Meng Weng Wong, 18:46
- Waving a flag for version 1, Jasper Wallace, 18:31
- Re: let the publishing begin ... soon, Jasper Wallace, 17:33
- Re: let the publishing begin ... soon, Izzy Kindred, 17:26
- let the publishing begin ... soon, Meng Weng Wong, 17:08
- Re: IPv6 expert wanted, Klaus Alexander Seistrup, 15:37
- Re: ip4-cidr needs clarification, Meng Weng Wong, 15:20
- Re: ip4-cidr needs clarification, Jasper Wallace, 14:14
- Re: IPv6 expert wanted, Meng Weng Wong, 13:56
- Re: IPv6 expert wanted, Graham Murray, 13:53
- A and MX mechanisms gain CIDR suffixes: a/24, mx/24., Meng Weng Wong, 13:51
- Re: IPv6 expert wanted, Phil Howard, 13:32
- IPv6 expert wanted, Meng Weng Wong, 13:05
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism: email restrictions, Meng Weng Wong, 12:53
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism: email restrictions, Richard Pitt, 12:46
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism: email restrictions, Meng Weng Wong, 11:53
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism: email restrictions, Richard Pitt, 11:40
- Re: revisiting the LocalPart mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 09:46
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism: email restrictions, Meng Weng Wong, 09:44
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 09:43
- Re: ip4-cidr needs clarification, Meng Weng Wong, 09:13
- RE: SPF reporting mechanism, Richard Pitt, 08:37
- ip4-cidr needs clarification, Roy Badami, 08:13
- ip4-cidr needs clarification, Roy Badami, 08:08
- Suggested clarifications for the draft, Roy Badami, 07:32
- RE: SPF reporting mechanism, Marc, 07:13
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, Roy Badami, 07:07
- revisiting the LocalPart mechanism, Roy Badami, 07:05
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Roy Badami, 06:57
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, Graham Murray, 03:46
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, Sam Horrocks, 00:17
October 25, 2003
- Re: new mechanisms RHS and PTRHS, Meng Weng Wong, 21:58
- Re: SPF reporting mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 21:26
- Re: revisiting the LocalPart mechanism, Justin Mason, 21:05
- SPF reporting mechanism, Sam Horrocks, 20:41
- new mechanisms RHS and PTRHS, Meng Weng Wong, 18:56
- Re: revisiting the LocalPart mechanism, Rob Kaper, 18:47
- SPF now has a blog, Meng Weng Wong, 18:31
- Re: small suggestions to the web site about port 25 filtering and rfc2476, Meng Weng Wong, 18:21
- Re: revisiting the LocalPart mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 18:17
- small suggestions to the web site about port 25 filtering and rfc2476, Loic Prylli, 18:16
- revisiting the LocalPart mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 18:07
October 24, 2003
- Re: SPF is only one component in a policy suite, Rob Kaper, 21:10
- Re: what to do upon syntax error?, Meng Weng Wong, 18:21
- Re: what to do upon syntax error?, Aredridel, 18:18
- Re: what to do upon syntax error?, Aredridel, 18:16
- Re: primary lavel at top-level domain.com, not _spf, spf, 16:16
- RE: primary lavel at top-level domain.com, not _spf, Arlie Davis, 16:13
- Re: primary lavel at top-level domain.com, not _spf, Don Koch, 16:02
- Re: is timestamp in exp string unnecessary?, Rob Kaper, 14:57
- ASRG reconciliation effort in the news, mentions SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 13:41
- is timestamp in exp string unnecessary?, Meng Weng Wong, 13:22
- SPF is only one component in a policy suite, Meng Weng Wong, 12:30
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Meng Weng Wong, 11:27
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, R. Scott Perry, 11:02
- Re: what to do upon syntax error?, Hans Dieter Pearcey, 11:01
- Re: what to do upon syntax error?, R. Scott Perry, 10:58
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Aredridel, 10:57
- Re: what to do upon syntax error?, Jason, 10:52
- include recursion and loop detection, Meng Weng Wong, 10:51
- Re: what to do upon syntax error?, Justin Mason, 10:47
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Mark Jeftovic, 10:00
- Re: what to do upon syntax error?, Rob Kaper, 09:37
- what to do upon syntax error?, Meng Weng Wong, 09:25
- A couple of minor questions, Philip Gladstone, 06:21
- Re: 3 nits with draft RFC, Rob Kaper, 05:50
- 3 nits with draft RFC, Justin Mason, 00:22
October 23, 2003
- new web page describing mechanisms, Meng Weng Wong, 23:25
- primary lavel at top-level domain.com, not _spf, Meng Weng Wong, 21:38
- media report, Meng Weng Wong, 15:14
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Dustin Trammell, 14:53
- SPF as enabler for other systems eg Habeas[tm], Meng Weng Wong, 14:16
- Re: Conflicting standards, Meng Weng Wong, 14:07
- Re: Typo in draft, Meng Weng Wong, 14:03
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 13:29
- Re: SMTP+SPF test tool, R. Scott Perry, 11:31
- SMTP+SPF test tool, R. Scott Perry, 07:42
- Re: Publishing SPF records, Rob Kaper, 06:37
- Re: Publishing SPF records, R. Scott Perry, 06:22
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 04:52
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 04:17
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 03:48
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 03:02
October 22, 2003
- Typo in draft, Rob Kaper, 23:23
- Re: Publishing SPF records, Rob Kaper, 21:27
- Conflicting standards, Rob Kaper, 21:25
- Re: Publishing SPF records, Meng Weng Wong, 21:12
- Publishing SPF records, Rob Kaper, 17:13
- Re: report from ISPcon, Andrew Boling, 12:42
- Re: report from ISPcon, Andrew Boling, 12:36
- Re: .forward issues, Phil White, 12:21
- RE: report from ISPcon, Jesus Duarte, 10:40
- RE: report from ISPcon, Oliver Gerler, 09:26
- RE: report from ISPcon, Dustin Trammell, 08:55
- Re: .forward issues, Meng Weng Wong, 08:26
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Roy Badami, 03:57
- Re: .forward issues, Nick Phillips, 03:16
- Re: .forward issues, Meng Weng Wong, 02:31
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Nick Phillips, 02:26
October 21, 2003
- report from ISPcon, Roy Badami, 17:01
- RE: .forward issues, Roy Badami, 16:58
- report from ISPcon, Meng Weng Wong, 16:29
- Re: I seem to be trying to send out spam!, Phil White, 15:29
- RE: .forward issues, Dustin Trammell, 12:16
- Re: .forward issues, Izzy Kindred, 12:04
- Re: DNS RRtypes, Justin Mason, 11:59
- RE: .forward issues, Oliver Gerler, 11:28
- RE: .forward issues, Dustin Trammell, 11:08
- Re: DNS RRtypes, Gerald Oskoboiny, 10:15
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Jonathan Steinert, 09:58
- Re: I seem to be trying to send out spam!, Anthony Campbell, 09:54
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Aredridel, 09:52
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Jonathan Steinert, 09:33
- RE: I seem to be trying to send out spam!, Dustin Trammell, 09:29
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 08:25
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Aredridel, 07:59
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Aredridel, 07:50
- I seem to be trying to send out spam!, Anthony Campbell, 01:20
October 20, 2003
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Izzy Kindred, 23:17
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Justin Mason, 22:01
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Meng Weng Wong, 21:47
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Justin Mason, 21:37
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Mark Lentczner, 20:48
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Roy Badami, 17:30
- .forward issues, Roy Badami, 16:55
- deny can be softened at MTA discretion, Roy Badami, 16:26
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Ted Cabeen, 16:22
- .forward issues, Meng Weng Wong, 16:20
- deny can be softened at MTA discretion, Meng Weng Wong, 16:18
- Re: .forward sunrise mechanism, Roy Badami, 16:13
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Roy Badami, 16:08
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Meng Weng Wong, 16:03
- Re: .forward sunrise mechanism, Meng Weng Wong, 16:00
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Phil White, 15:55
- BP mechanism for debugging, Meng Weng Wong, 15:55
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Meng Weng Wong, 15:47
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Phil White, 15:43
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Roy Badami, 15:42
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Dustin Trammell, 15:19
- softdeny mis-speced, Meng Weng Wong, 15:12
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Roy Badami, 14:34
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Roy Badami, 14:26
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Izzy Kindred, 14:23
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Dustin Trammell, 14:22
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Roy Badami, 14:22
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Roy Badami, 14:16
- Re: new draft RFC 90% done., Roy Badami, 14:04
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Jonathan Steinert, 13:51
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Mark Lentczner, 13:04
- .forward sunrise mechanism, Roy Badami, 13:01
- RE: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Dustin Trammell, 12:58
- Re: Miscellaneous Thoughts, Phil White, 12:18
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Phil White, 11:27
- Another suggestion., Ted Cabeen, 10:40
- Re: DNS RRtypes, Jonathan Steinert, 10:15
- RE: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Dustin Trammell, 10:01
- RE: DNS RRtypes: creating a new RRtype, Dustin Trammell, 09:57
- Re: Miscellaneous Thoughts, Andreas Kreuzinger, 04:04
- Re: DNS RRtypes, Gerald Oskoboiny, 02:49
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Izzy Kindred, 00:45
- Re: Alternatives to DNS for SPF?, Eric S. Raymond, 00:02
October 19, 2003
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Phil White, 21:44
- Re: Alternatives to DNS for SPF?, Russell Kroll, 21:04
- Re: Alternatives to DNS for SPF?, Aredridel, 20:57
- Re: Alternatives to DNS for SPF?, Eric S. Raymond, 20:29
- Re: Alternatives to DNS for SPF?, Justin Mason, 20:23
- Alternatives to DNS for SPF?, Russell Kroll, 20:04
- URL Encoding, Mark Lentczner, 10:26
- Re: DNS RRtypes: creating a new RRtype, Eric S. Raymond, 09:11
- Re: DNS RRtypes: creating a new RRtype, Andrew Boling, 09:04
- Re: DNS RRtypes: creating a new RRtype, Mark Lentczner, 08:54
- Re: DNS RRtypes: creating a new RRtype, Eric S. Raymond, 00:20
October 18, 2003
- Volunteers needed for new web site, Meng Weng Wong, 21:40
- DNS RRtypes: creating a new RRtype, Meng Weng Wong, 21:17
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Eric S. Raymond, 21:14
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Meng Weng Wong, 21:08
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Mark Lentczner, 21:06
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Eric S. Raymond, 21:01
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Aredridel, 20:39
- Re: DNS RRtypes: changing PI, Meng Weng Wong, 20:31
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, Meng Weng Wong, 14:51
- Re: "primary" policy TXT records, Meng Weng Wong, 11:22
- Re: new draft RFC 90% done: updated Explanation directive, Meng Weng Wong, 11:00
- Re: new draft RFC 90% done, another small issue, Mark Lentczner, 09:22
- Re: new draft RFC 90% done., Mark Lentczner, 08:47
- new draft RFC 90% done., Meng Weng Wong, 00:05
October 17, 2003
- Re: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Phil White, 17:52
- Re: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Eric S. Raymond, 15:58
- Re: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Izzy Kindred, 15:54
- RE: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Edward Ned Harvey, 15:33
- Re: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Jason, 14:06
- Re: Dumb list question., Meng Weng Wong, 13:31
- Dumb list question., Andrew Boling, 13:07
- Re: DNS RRtypes, Meng Weng Wong, 12:44
- Re: DNS RRtypes, Robert Spier, 11:57
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, Andrew Boling, 11:24
- Re: DNS RRtypes, Eric S. Raymond, 11:16
- Re: SSL certs, Andrew Boling, 11:15
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, Justin Mason, 10:56
- Re: SSL certs, Ted Cabeen, 10:53
- Re: RMX Reconciliation - A list has been setup, Meng Weng Wong, 09:45
- RE: DNS RRtypes, Dustin Trammell, 09:22
- RE: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Dustin Trammell, 09:21
- SSL certs, Meng Weng Wong, 09:19
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, Mark Foster, 09:16
- Re: DNS RRtypes, Meng Weng Wong, 09:16
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Loic Prylli, 08:34
- DNS RRtypes, Meng Weng Wong, 08:17
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Eric S. Raymond, 00:33
October 16, 2003
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Meng Weng Wong, 22:52
- Workaround for .forwards, Meng Weng Wong, 20:36
- Re: Anything better than Sender Rewriting Scheme?, Phil White, 20:04
- Re: Protecting more than just the envelope-from, Phil White, 19:42
- Re: using HELO instead of MAIL FROM with SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 18:33
- Re: Protecting more than just the envelope-from, Meng Weng Wong, 18:18
- Anything better than Sender Rewriting Scheme?, Meng Weng Wong, 17:56
- Re: Miscellaneous Thoughts, Eric S. Raymond, 17:50
- Re: Protecting more than just the envelope-from, Phil White, 17:13
- Re: using HELO instead of MAIL FROM with SPF, Phil White, 17:12
- Re: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Phil White, 17:11
- Re: Protecting more than just the envelope-from, Phil White, 16:59
- Re: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Izzy Kindred, 16:42
- Miscellaneous Thoughts, Phil White, 16:39
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, wayne, 16:04
- Re: using HELO instead of MAIL FROM with SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 15:53
- Re: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Meng Weng Wong, 15:50
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, Meng Weng Wong, 15:37
- Re: new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Phil White, 15:10
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, Justin Mason, 15:08
- Re: Adding our chips to the ante. (Postmark.net), wayne, 14:53
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, wayne, 14:49
- Re: SRV records, Eric S. Raymond, 14:22
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, wayne, 14:15
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, Andrew Boling, 14:10
- Re: Protecting more than just the envelope-from, Meng Weng Wong, 14:06
- Re: SRV records, wayne, 14:05
- Adding our chips to the ante. (Postmark.net), Andrew Boling, 14:04
- Re: SRV records, Eric S. Raymond, 13:45
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, Meng Weng Wong, 13:36
- Re: SRV records, Meng Weng Wong, 13:31
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Meng Weng Wong, 13:13
- SPF will be named SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 12:10
- new draft RFC: thoughts on localpart, Meng Weng Wong, 11:14
- RE: spam is like smallpox; rambling thoughts, Dustin Trammell, 10:20
- Re: spam is like smallpox; rambling thoughts, Meng Weng Wong, 09:38
- RE: spam is like smallpox, Dustin Trammell, 09:09
- spam is like smallpox, Meng Weng Wong, 08:22
October 15, 2003
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Justin Mason, 22:08
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 22:03
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Justin Mason, 21:24
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 19:38
- Re: Protecting more than just the envelope-from, wayne, 19:28
- RE: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Dustin Trammell, 11:35
- Re: Protecting more than just the envelope-from, Meng Weng Wong, 11:16
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Tim Wilde, 10:33
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Meng Weng Wong, 10:06
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Nicolas Bougues, 10:02
- RE: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Dustin Trammell, 09:43
- RE: Accelerating SPF deployment, Dustin Trammell, 09:38
- RE: Accelerating SPF deployment, Dustin Trammell, 09:36
- RE: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Dustin Trammell, 09:35
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Nicolas Bougues, 09:30
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Jason, 09:13
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 09:04
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Nicolas Bougues, 08:54
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 08:32
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 08:27
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, Meng Weng Wong, 08:18
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Jason, 08:16
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 08:13
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 07:49
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 07:19
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, wayne, 07:01
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 05:52
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, RKML, 05:33
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, Eric S. Raymond, 01:12
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, Nick Phillips, 01:08
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 00:38
October 14, 2003
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, Justin Mason, 22:32
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, wayne, 22:16
- Re: Protecting more than just the envelope-from, Tim Wilde, 22:04
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, Meng Weng Wong, 22:01
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, wayne, 21:56
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 21:51
- Re: Accelerating SPF deployment, Meng Weng Wong, 21:46
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Justin Mason, 21:27
- Protecting more than just the envelope-from, wayne, 21:24
- Accelerating SPF deployment, Eric S. Raymond, 21:23
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 20:52
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Eric S. Raymond, 20:46
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 20:45
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 20:25
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, wayne, 20:16
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problemy, Eric S. Raymond, 15:56
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Eric S. Raymond, 15:48
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 15:32
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 15:31
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Ted Cabeen, 15:26
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 15:25
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Eric S. Raymond, 15:17
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 15:07
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Meng Weng Wong, 15:05
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Justin Mason, 14:57
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Eric S. Raymond, 14:53
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Eric S. Raymond, 14:48
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Eric S. Raymond, 14:45
- RE: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Dustin Trammell, 14:39
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Justin Mason, 14:35
- Re: Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Erik Corry, 14:29
- Attacking the throwaway-domain problem, Eric S. Raymond, 14:20
- Re: updates from Foo Camp, Meng Weng Wong, 14:10
- RE: updates from Foo Camp, Dustin Trammell, 13:55
- updates from Foo Camp, Meng Weng Wong, 13:19
October 12, 2003
- Re: reviewing alternative proposals, wayne, 18:52
- Re: reviewing alternative proposals: RMX v3, wayne, 18:47
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, wayne, 10:04
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Edward Ned Harvey, 09:06
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, wayne, 08:49
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Edward Ned Harvey, 08:29
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Edward Ned Harvey, 06:46
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, root, 00:41
October 11, 2003
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, root, 23:27
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, root, 23:07
- reviewing alternative proposals, Meng Weng Wong, 19:43
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org, wayne, 17:55
- Re: Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org (was: The .forward problem), Meng Weng Wong, 14:05
- The future of blacklists under SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 11:13
- Global whitelist: wl.trusted-forwarder.org (was: The .forward problem), wayne, 11:10
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, wayne, 10:56
October 10, 2003
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Meng Weng Wong, 23:19
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, wayne, 20:49
- Re: Throwaway domains, wayne, 20:02
- Re: The .forward problem, wayne, 19:23
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Bryan Campbell, 16:31
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Bryan Campbell, 15:18
- SRV records, Meng Weng Wong, 15:10
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Meng Weng Wong, 15:02
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Meng Weng Wong, 14:36
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Jim Popovitch, 14:15
- Re: new RR type, wayne, 13:10
- Re: The .forward problem, wayne, 12:49
- RE: new RR type, Paul Wouters, 12:43
- RE: new RR type, Arlie Davis, 12:36
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Arlie Davis, 12:34
- Re: new draft RFC under construction, Loic Prylli, 11:51
- Re: new RR type, wayne, 11:13
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Jim Popovitch, 10:18
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Mr. Ned, 05:47
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Loic Prylli, 05:04
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Arlie Davis, 00:50
October 09, 2003
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Richard Pitt, 22:32
- new draft RFC under construction, Meng Weng Wong, 21:22
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Jim Popovitch, 21:08
- RE: Anti-spam, Mr. Ned, 18:58
- RE: Anti-spam, Peter Viertel, 17:19
- RE: Solving throwaway domains using RHSBLs not whois, Arlie Davis, 16:53
- Re: Solving throwaway domains using RHSBLs not whois, RKML, 16:06
- RE: Solving throwaway domains using RHSBLs not whois, Arlie Davis, 15:20
- Re: Anti-spam, Mr. Ned, 13:32
- Re: Anti-spam, Mr. Ned, 13:06
- Re: Twilight period/configuration, Dan Boresjo, 12:22
- Re: Solving throwaway domains using RHSBLs not whois, Erik Corry, 11:51
- Re: greylisting, David Saez, 10:54
- greylisting, Meng Weng Wong, 09:48
- Re: Anti-spam, Paul Wouters, 09:48
- Re: Anti-spam, Meng Weng Wong, 09:44
- Re: Twilight period/configuration, David Saez, 09:40
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Meng Weng Wong, 09:31
- Greylisting, Meng Weng Wong, 09:27
- Solving throwaway domains using RHSBLs not whois, Meng Weng Wong, 09:25
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Dustin Trammell, 09:17
- Re: Twilight period/configuration, Richard Pitt, 09:07
- RE: Throwaway domains, Bryce Jasmer, 08:57
- Twilight period/configuration, Dan Boresjo, 08:26
- Re: Throwaway domains, Mark Jeftovic, 08:22
- Re: Throwaway domains, Erik Corry, 06:39
- Re: Throwaway domains, Mark Jeftovic, 06:15
- Throwaway domains, Erik Corry, 05:49
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Erik Corry, 05:36
- Anti-spam, Mr. Ned, 04:50
- Re: The .forward problem, Nick Phillips, 02:23
October 08, 2003
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Matthew, 23:50
- respecting per-user preferences, Meng Weng Wong, 22:34
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 21:23
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 21:10
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 20:53
- RE: new RR type, Arlie Davis, 16:32
- Re: Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [anti-spam-wg(_at_)ripe(_dot_)net] I wrote a spam filter in Perl, wayne, 16:22
- Re: new RR type, Paul Wouters, 10:34
- removing the need for wildcards, Meng Weng Wong, 09:47
- Re: Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [anti-spam-wg(_at_)ripe(_dot_)net] I wrote a spam filter in Perl, Jason, 09:34
- new RR type, Meng Weng Wong, 07:54
- Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [anti-spam-wg(_at_)ripe(_dot_)net] I wrote a spam filter in Perl, Paul Wouters, 05:13
October 07, 2003
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Peter Viertel, 17:14
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Dustin Trammell, 16:20
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Matthew, 16:14
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Russell Kroll, 15:49
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Matthew, 15:31
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Meng Weng Wong, 15:28
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Richard Pitt, 13:56
- RE: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Dustin Trammell, 13:36
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Matthew, 13:14
- Re: The .forward problem, Ted Cabeen, 12:23
- Re: The .forward problem, Matthew, 11:06
- The .forward problem, Meng Weng Wong, 10:10
- Re: going by message-id, David Saez, 09:47
- Re: going by message-id, Andrew Sweger, 09:37
- RE: SPF on slashdot, Dustin Trammell, 08:50
- Re: going by message-id, David Saez, 07:57
- Re: SPF and IPv6, Klaus Alexander Seistrup, 04:48
- the big challenge of forwarding : rely more on HELO and authorized intermediates?, Loic Prylli, 04:22
- Where are the new draft ?!?!, Justo Alonso, 04:09
- Re: Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Matthew, 00:47
- Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?, Phil Karn, 00:10
- SPF and IPV6, Graham Murray, 00:08
October 06, 2003
- Re: New zone publishing SPF records, Tugrul Galatali, 23:12
- Re: SPF on slashdot, Larry Smith, 19:19
- New zone publishing SPF records, I)ruid, 19:09
- RE: SPF on slashdot, Bryce Jasmer, 17:12
- Re: SPF on slashdot, Howard Lee Harkness, 16:58
- Re: SPF on slashdot, Meng Weng Wong, 16:51
- .forward implies recipients must whitelist forwarding hosts, Meng Weng Wong, 16:11
- Re: Your examples have problems with BIND, Andy, 16:08
- Your examples have problems with BIND, Jason, 13:54
- Re: going by message-id, Ted Cabeen, 13:52
- going by message-id, Meng Weng Wong, 13:12
- Re: SPF on slashdot, Nick Phillips, 12:32
- DynDNS + SPF = :-), Meng Weng Wong, 12:28
- Re: dyndns, Tim Wilde, 12:25
- Re: is there a better solution than sender rewriting?, Russell Kroll, 12:19
- dyndns, Meng Weng Wong, 12:17
- Re: is there a better solution than sender rewriting?, Tim Wilde, 12:04
- Re: is sender rewriting really necessary?, Ted Cabeen, 12:02
- Re: is sender rewriting really necessary?, David Saez, 11:57
- is sender rewriting really necessary?, Meng Weng Wong, 11:21
- is there a better solution than sender rewriting?, Meng Weng Wong, 11:06
- ben(_at_)ben(_dot_)com: you use both "fail" and "deny" in SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 10:26
- Re: MailArmory to support SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 09:01
- Re: SPF on slashdot, Meng Weng Wong, 08:24
- Re: Concerns about SPF and ebay messages, Meng Weng Wong, 08:14
- Re: Concerns about SPF and ebay messages, RKML, 07:55
- Re: Concerns about SPF and ebay messages, David Saez, 07:16
- Re: Concerns about SPF and ebay messages, wayne, 06:22
- Re: Concerns about SPF and ebay messages, Mark Foster, 06:17
- Re: SPF on slashdot, Howard Lee Harkness, 03:54
October 05, 2003
- reporting possibly outdated link on spf intro, reporter bugger, 23:45
- Re: Concerns about SPF and ebay messages, David Saez, 23:43
- Concerns about SPF and ebay messages, RKML, 23:32
- Re: SPF on slashdot, Meng Weng Wong, 22:10
- Re: SPF on slashdot, wayne, 20:25
- SPF on slashdot, Walt Mankowski, 18:34