SPF Discuss (thread)

Multiple txt records?, Dan Durrer, 2004/07/31
- Re: Multiple txt records?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/31
Case Sensitivity, marc, 2004/07/31
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/31
- RE: Case Sensitivity, Scott Kitterman, 2004/07/31
  - RE: Case Sensitivity, James Couzens, 2004/07/31
    - RE: Case Sensitivity, James Couzens, 2004/07/31
- Re: Case Sensitivity, James Couzens, 2004/07/31
- Re: Re: Case Sensitivity, marc, 2004/07/31
  - Case Sensitivity, Roger Moser, 2004/07/31
Distrowatch article on SPF, Robert Storey, 2004/07/30
- RE: Distrowatch article on SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/07/30
- Re: Distrowatch article on SPF, Richard Parker, 2004/07/30
  - RE: Distrowatch article on SPF, John Glube, 2004/07/30
- Re: Distrowatch article on SPF, Guillaume Filion, 2004/07/30
- Re: Distrowatch article on SPF, James Couzens, 2004/07/30
  - Re: Distrowatch article on SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Distrowatch article on SPF, Robert Storey, 2004/07/31
(unknown), Shoaib, 2004/07/29
- Re:, wayne, 2004/07/30
  - RE:, Shoaib, 2004/07/30
  - mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Mark, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Greg Connor, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Greg Connor, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Tim Kennedy, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
    - mail administrator certification example, Roger Moser, 2004/07/31
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Alan Hodgson, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Mark, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/31
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Koen Martens, 2004/07/31
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Xavier Beaudouin, 2004/07/31
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, John Keown, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, wayne, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/30
    - Re: mail administrator certification example, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/30
Need to promote process changes, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/29
- Re: Need to promote process changes, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/29
  - RE: Need to promote process changes, terry, 2004/07/29
Error 0x80070103 - 0x0 while excluding recipients from a message rejection, Postmaster, 2004/07/28
- RE: Error 0x80070103 - 0x0 while excluding recipients from a message rejection, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/07/28
  - RE: Error 0x80070103 - 0x0 while excluding recipients from a message rejection, Postmaster, 2004/07/29
- Re: Error 0x80070103 - 0x0 while excluding recipients from a message rejection, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
  - Error 0x80070103 - 0x0 while excluding recipients from a message rejection, Jupiter(_at_)PlanetJup, 2004/07/29
ANNOUNCE: spf.infinitepenguins.net / spfTools.net site update, James Couzens, 2004/07/28
- Re: ANNOUNCE: spf.infinitepenguins.net / spfTools.net site update, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/28
  - Re: ANNOUNCE: spf.infinitepenguins.net / spfTools.net site update, James Couzens, 2004/07/28
- Re: ANNOUNCE: spf.infinitepenguins.net / spfTools.net site update, Richard Parker, 2004/07/28
- Re: ANNOUNCE: spf.infinitepenguins.net / spfTools.net site update, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/28
  - Re: ANNOUNCE: spf.infinitepenguins.net / spfTools.net site update, James Couzens, 2004/07/29
[MAILER-DAEMON: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details], Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: [MAILER-DAEMON: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details], rogerk, 2004/07/28
  - sender authentication vs smtp authentication, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/28
Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, John Keown, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
  - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Thomas Harold, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, wayne, 2004/07/28
- Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
  - Re: Overly broad ip range in spf - think like a spammer, John Keown, 2004/07/28
Mailtraq SPF beta, Jim Hill, 2004/07/27
CHALLENGE: a list of 100 Good Domains, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/27
- Re: CHALLENGE: a list of 100 Good Domains, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/27
List of Registrars that support TXT in DNS., Josep M., 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Registrars that support TXT in DNS., Koen Martens, 2004/07/27
  - Re: List of Registrars that support TXT in DNS., Josep M., 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Registrars that support TXT in DNS., wayne, 2004/07/27
  - Re: List of Registrars that support TXT in DNS., Josep M., 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Registrars that support TXT in DNS., Ian, 2004/07/28
- Re: List of Registrars that support TXT in DNS., Thomas Harold, 2004/07/28
  - Re: List of Registrars that support TXT in DNS., Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/27
- Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/27
  - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/30
    - Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Roger Moser, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Greg Connor, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Envelope Sender X From Header. How are you treating this?, Rodrigo F Afonso, 2004/07/30
List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Josep M., 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/27
  - Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Josep M., 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/27
- RE: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/07/27
  - RE: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, terry, 2004/07/27
    - RE: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Josep M., 2004/07/27
- RE: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/07/27
  - RE: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Josep M., 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Arjen de Korte, 2004/07/27
  - Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Mark Jeftovic, 2004/07/27
    - Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow addSPF into DNS?, Josep M., 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Thomas Harold, 2004/07/27
- Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/27
  - Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Josep M., 2004/07/27
    - Re: List of Domain Names Registrars that allow add SPF into DNS?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/27
Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, wayne, 2004/07/26
- Re: Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Ben Damm, 2004/07/26
  - Re: Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/07/26
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Roger Moser, 2004/07/27
  - Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/27
    - Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/07/27
    - Re: Re: [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
    - RE: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/27
    - RE: Re: [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
    - Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, David Sowder, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
  - Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/27
- Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Rob McMahon, 2004/07/29
  - Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, wayne, 2004/07/29
    - Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/29
    - Re: Re: [spf-devel] [POLITICAL INFIGHTING] Difference between spf/spf2 srs/srs2, Shevek, 2004/07/30
Re: Sendmail releases benchmarking results for DomainKeys by Yahoo!, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/26
best guess, Philip Tucker, 2004/07/26
Military, G E Scott Knauss, 2004/07/26
- Re: Military, wayne, 2004/07/27
- Re: Military, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/27
  - Re: Military, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Arjen de Korte, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Chip Mefford, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Shevek, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Military, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, wayne, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Paul Ficinski, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - RE: Re: Military, Vivien M., 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Alan Hodgson, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Alan Hodgson, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/29
    - Re: Re: Military, Koen Martens, 2004/07/30
    - Re: Re: Military, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Koen Martens, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, rogerk, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/29
    - Re: Re: Military, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, wayne, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/28
    - Re: Re: Military, John Keown, 2004/07/28
Re: ANNOUNCE: libspf v1.0 RELEASE CANDIDATE 2, Shevek, 2004/07/26
Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 07/26/04, Wayne Schlitt, 2004/07/25
spfTools.net; A Call for all SPF related tools, James Couzens, 2004/07/25
The future of spf.infinitepenguins.net, James Couzens, 2004/07/25
- Re: The future of spf.infinitepenguins.net, Koen Martens, 2004/07/25
  - Re: The future of spf.infinitepenguins.net, James Couzens, 2004/07/26
    - Re: The future of spf.infinitepenguins.net, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/26
Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Roger Moser, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/25
  - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, william(at)elan.net, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/26
  - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Graham Murray, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/25
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/25
  - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Roger Moser, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Alan Hodgson, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Koen Martens, 2004/07/26
  - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Koen Martens, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/27
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Koen Martens, 2004/07/27
- Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/27
  - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/07/27
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/27
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/27
- Re:Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/26
  - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/27
  - Re:Support for Internationalized Explanations, Roger Moser, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re:Support for Internationalized Explanations, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Re:Support for Internationalized Explanations, Roger Moser, 2004/07/26
  - Re: Support for Internationalized Explanations, Richard Parker, 2004/07/26
Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/24
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/25
  - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/25
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/25
  - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/26
- Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/26
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/07/25
  - RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, william(at)elan.net, 2004/07/25
  - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/25
  - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Koen Martens, 2004/07/25
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/07/25
  - RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/07/25
    - RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Graham Murray, 2004/07/26
    - RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Paul Iadonisi, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/25
    - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/26
- RE: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/07/25
  - Re: Fwd: Sender-ID and free software, Jan Wildeboer, 2004/07/26
[SPF] What to do in Windows 2003 and a .local domain DNS, Dwain Hutten, 2004/07/24
- Re: [SPF] What to do in Windows 2003 and a .local domain DNS, Koen Martens, 2004/07/24
  - RE: [SPF] What to do in Windows 2003 and a .local domain DNS, Dwain Hutten, 2004/07/24
    - RE: [SPF] What to do in Windows 2003 and a .local domain DNS, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/07/24
Why has Wayne stolen my domain?, James Couzens, 2004/07/24
- Re: Why has Wayne stolen my domain?, Marc Kool, 2004/07/24
  - Re: Why has Wayne stolen my domain?, James Couzens, 2004/07/24
- Re: Why has Wayne stolen my domain?, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/24
  - Re: Why has Wayne stolen my domain?, James Couzens, 2004/07/24
- Re: Why has Wayne stolen my domain?, Greg Connor, 2004/07/26
  - Re: Why has [somebody] [alledgedly] stolen [somebody's] domain?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Why has [somebody] [alledgedly] stolen [somebody's] domain?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/26
    - Re: Why has [somebody] [alledgedly] stolen [somebody's] domain?, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/27
    - Re: Why has [somebody] [alledgedly] stolen [somebody's] domain?, James Couzens, 2004/07/27
Imail SPF filter, Oscar Ssentoogo, 2004/07/24
Is SPF all that useful?, Gilbert, Joseph, 2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF all that useful?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF all that useful?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/23
  - Re: Is SPF all that useful?, James Couzens, 2004/07/24
- RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Gilbert, Joseph, 2004/07/23
  - Re: Is SPF all that useful?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
  - Re: Is SPF all that useful?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/23
    - RE: Is SPF all that useful?, terry, 2004/07/24
    - RE: Is SPF all that useful?, frank, 2004/07/24
    - Re: Is SPF all that useful?, A.G. Russell IV, 2004/07/24
- RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Gilbert, Joseph, 2004/07/23
  - RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/24
  - Re: Is SPF all that useful?, Thomas Harold, 2004/07/27
- RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Gilbert, Joseph, 2004/07/23
- RE: Is SPF all that useful?, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/27
Infoworld article on Microsoft enforcing SenderID, systhine, 2004/07/23
URGENTish please respond., Jesse Gordon, 2004/07/22
- Re: URGENTish please respond., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 2004/07/22
ANNOUNCE: libSPF v1.0 RELEASE CANDIDATE 4, James Couzens, 2004/07/22
SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Dotzero, 2004/07/22
- Re: *****SPAM***** SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/22
  - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
- Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jef Poskanzer, 2004/07/22
  - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, A.G. Russell IV, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
    - RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Glube, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Justin Mason, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, James Couzens, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Len Conrad, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Paul Ficinski, 2004/07/23
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Mark C. Langston, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, A.G. Russell IV, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Graham Murray, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Arjen de Korte, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/24
    - RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, terry, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, John Keown, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
- RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/23
- RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/23
  - RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Len Conrad, 2004/07/23
    - RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
  - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Koen Martens, 2004/07/23
  - RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, James Couzens, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/24
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/26
    - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/26
  - RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/26
- RE: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/26
  - Re: SPF will solve spam and punish spammers, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/26
Re: Digest 1.389 for spf-discuss, Jesse Gordon, 2004/07/22
- Re: Digest 1.389 for spf-discuss, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/22
Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/21
  - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Graham Murray, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Paul Ficinski, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
  - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/22
    - RE: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, terry, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/23
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/23
    - Moderate or die?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/23
    - Re: Moderate or die?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/23
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Len Conrad, 2004/07/21
  - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Len Conrad, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
  - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, John Keown, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
- Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/21
  - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
  - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, spf, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/23
    - Re: Is SPF serving the best interests of the end-user?, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/23
Broken SPF implementations among this list's subscribers ?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: Broken SPF implementations among this list's subscribers ?, wayne, 2004/07/21
  - Re: Broken SPF implementations among this list's subscribers ?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
    - Re: Broken SPF implementations among this list's subscribers ?, B Damm, 2004/07/22
- RE: Broken SPF implementations among this list's subscribers ?, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/21
  - Re: Broken SPF implementations among this list's subscribers ?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
  - Re: Broken SPF implementations among this list's subscribers ?, wayne, 2004/07/21
MX -> TXT SPF widlcard records, Murthy Gorty, 2004/07/20
- Re: MX -> TXT SPF widlcard records, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/20
- Re: MX -> TXT SPF widlcard records, Roger Moser, 2004/07/20
- Re: MX -> TXT SPF widlcard records, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/20
  - Re: MX -> TXT SPF widlcard records, Murthy Gorty, 2004/07/21
    - Re: MX -> TXT SPF widlcard records, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/19
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/20
  - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/20
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/21
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/21
    - Re: [O.T] [Was: SPF and Responsibility], Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/21
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF and Responsibility, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Graham Murray, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, mhammer, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Beveridge, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Daniel Taylor, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/22
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF and Responsibility, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Sowder, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Sowder, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, terry, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Thomas Harold, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Chris Haynes, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/22
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF and Responsibility, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Len Conrad, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/22
    - RE: SPF and Responsibility, John Glube, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/23
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Greg Wooledge, 2004/07/22
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/21
    - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
- Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jef Poskanzer, 2004/07/21
  - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/21
  - Re: SPF and Responsibility, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/21
Re: PTR lookups in SPF, administrator, 2004/07/19
Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 07/19/04, Wayne Schlitt, 2004/07/18
Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, administrator, 2004/07/17
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/17
  - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/18
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/18
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Koen Martens, 2004/07/19
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/19
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/19
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/19
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Roger Moser, 2004/07/17
  - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/17
    - Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Roger Moser, 2004/07/17
Difference between "softfail" and "neutral", Arjen de Korte, 2004/07/17
- Re: Difference between "softfail" and "neutral", Roger Moser, 2004/07/17
  - Re: Difference between "softfail" and "neutral", Hector Santos, 2004/07/17
Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, administrator, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Roger Moser, 2004/07/17
  - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/18
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, Roger Moser, 2004/07/18
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usableaslegal measure against spammers.), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/18
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Len Conrad, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, william(at)elan.net, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Jason Gurtz, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Len Conrad, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/20
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usableaslegal measure against spammers.), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/19
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, Graham Murray, 2004/07/19
    - Re: Re: PTR lookups in SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/20
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usableaslegal measure against spammers.), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/19
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/20
some more about my new install, cak+spf, 2004/07/16
- Re: some more about my new install, Koen Martens, 2004/07/16
new user, cak+spf, 2004/07/16
- RE: new user, terry, 2004/07/16
- Re: new user, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/07/16
- Re: new user, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/07/16
My last IETF Post, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/16
- Re: My last IETF Post, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/16
  - Re: My last IETF Post, wayne, 2004/07/16
    - Re: My last IETF Post, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/16
  - Re: My last IETF Post, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
    - Re: My last IETF Post, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/07/16
    - RE: My last IETF Post, John Glube, 2004/07/16
    - Re: My last IETF Post, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
    - Licensing Issue, John Glube, 2004/07/19
Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., administrator, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Graham Murray, 2004/07/16
- Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/16
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Koen Martens, 2004/07/17
  - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Len Conrad, 2004/07/17
  - PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/17
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.), Paul Howarth, 2004/07/17
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.), Roger Moser, 2004/07/17
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/17
    - Re: PTR lookups in SPF (was: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.), Roger Moser, 2004/07/17
If SPF is not final solution - What will you see during SPF -> next technology transition?, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/15
SPF TXT Records resulting in attack warnings, Tim Kennedy, 2004/07/15
sender_agents modifier, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/07/14
Paul Graham on new languages, mengwong, 2004/07/14
- Re: Paul Graham on new languages, david nicol, 2004/07/16
  - Re: Paul Graham on new languages, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
    - Re: Paul Graham on new languages, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/07/16
Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Holm, Mark, 2004/07/14
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/14
  - Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/14
    - RE: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, John Glube, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, wayne, 2004/07/14
  - Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/14
    - fair chance?, Marc Kool, 2004/07/14
    - Re: fair chance?, Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
    - Re: fair chance?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
    - Re: fair chance?, wayne, 2004/07/15
    - Re: fair chance?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/16
    - Re: fair chance?, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/16
    - Re: fair chance?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/16
    - Re: fair chance?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
- Re: Microsoft & Sender ID - SPF confusion as of mid July 2004, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
Citibank, Bourque Daniel, 2004/07/14
- Re: Citibank, Whil Hentzen, 2004/07/14
  - Re: Citibank, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
    - Re[2]: Citibank, Chris Drake, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Citibank, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
    - Re[2]: Citibank, Chris Drake, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Citibank, Koen Martens, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Citibank, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Citibank, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Citibank, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Citibank, Koen Martens, 2004/07/15
- Re: *****SPAM***** Citibank, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/14
  - Re: *****SPAM***** Citibank, Graham Murray, 2004/07/14
    - anti-phishing, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
    - Re: anti-phishing, Michel Bouissou, 2004/07/14
SPF TXT to English?, Paul Bissex, 2004/07/14
- Re: SPF TXT to English?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
  - Re: SPF TXT to English?, Paul Bissex, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF TXT to English?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/15
    - Re: SPF TXT to English?, Paul Bissex, 2004/07/15
MX secondary problem?, Dennis Carr, 2004/07/13
- Re: MX secondary problem?, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/13
  - Re: MX secondary problem?, wayne, 2004/07/14
- Re: MX secondary problem?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/13
- Re: MX secondary problem?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/15
- RE: MX secondary problem?, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/13
  - Re: MX secondary problem?, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/13
    - Re: MX secondary problem?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/14
    - AOL & ".vacation" forwarding ?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/14
- RE: MX secondary problem?, Ryan Malayter, 2004/07/14
  - RE: MX secondary problem?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/15
SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers. DomainKeys are probably yes. Routers hacked by spammers scenario., Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
- Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/13
  - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/14
  - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Chuck Mead, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/15
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., John Keown, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., John Keown, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., John Keown, 2004/07/14
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/15
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/15
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Chuck Mead, 2004/07/15
    - "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Hector Santos, 2004/07/15
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/15
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], david nicol, 2004/07/16
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable aslegal measure against spammers.], Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/16
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Matt Burleigh, 2004/07/15
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Hector Santos, 2004/07/15
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Matt Burleigh, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Michael Weiner, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Waitman Gobble, 2004/07/15
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Hector Santos, 2004/07/15
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Matt Burleigh, 2004/07/16
    - Alias/Real Email Accounts [Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.]], Hector Santos, 2004/07/16
    - Re: "Stripping Wars!" [Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers.], Mark Hardee, 2004/07/16
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Hector Santos, 2004/07/15
    - Re: I Invoke Godwin's law on GMail soap opera scripts, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/14
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/14
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/15
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/15
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/15
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/16
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/16
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/19
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., David Brodbeck, 2004/07/20
    - Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/20
    - Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/20
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/20
    - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Paul Howarth, 2004/07/20
    - Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/20
    - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Roger Moser, 2004/07/20
    - IMPORTANT: The main point Nico and Co. are trying to make, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/07/20
    - Re: *****SPAM***** IMPORTANT: The main point Nico and Co. are trying to make, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/21
    - Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/20
    - Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Len Conrad, 2004/07/20
    - Re: Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers., Roger B.A. Klorese , 2004/07/20
- RE: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers. DomainKeys are probably yes. Routers hacked by spammers scenario., John Glube, 2004/07/13
  - Re: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers. DomainKeys are probably yes. Routers hacked by spammers scenario., Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
    - RE: SPF is not usable as legal measure against spammers. DomainKeys are probably yes. Routers hacked by spammers scenario., John Glube, 2004/07/13
spf-discuss record changing to -all, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- Mixed Poliices [Re: spf-discuss record changing to -all], Hector Santos, 2004/07/13
  - Re: Mixed Poliices [Re: spf-discuss record changing to -all], Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
- Re: spf-discuss record changing to -all, David Woodhouse, 2004/07/13
- Re: spf-discuss record changing to -all, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/16
To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Mark Lentczner, 2004/07/12
- Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Justin Mason, 2004/07/12
  - Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
    - Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, wayne, 2004/07/12
    - RE: Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, John Glube, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, wayne, 2004/07/12
    - RE: Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, John Glube, 2004/07/12
    - Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/07/13
- Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, wayne, 2004/07/12
  - new SPF email checker utility, Chris Drake, 2004/07/12
    - Re: new SPF email checker utility, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/13
  - Re: *****SPAM***** Re: To all SPF-ians: Time for Chocolate, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/07/13
Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/12
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
  - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/12
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/07/13
  - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, David Brodbeck, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
    - RE: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
    - Re[2]: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, wayne, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, spf, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/14
    - RE: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/14
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/14
    - RE: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/15
    - RE: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Seth Goodman, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/13
  - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/13
    - Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Koen Martens, 2004/07/14
- Re: Are SPF fault tolerant ? How to make SPF records changed correctly ?, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/07/13
Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/12
- Re: Intuit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
  - Re: Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Intuit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Intuit, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Intuit, dr . midgley, 2004/07/15
    - Re: Intuit, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/07/15
ITU "spam" summit concludes in Geneva, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- Re: ITU "spam" summit concludes in Geneva, Mark C. Langston, 2004/07/12
  - Re: ITU "spam" summit concludes in Geneva, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
- RE: ITU "spam" summit concludes in Geneva, John Glube, 2004/07/12
RE: Creaky old logo, Michel Py, 2004/07/12
Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 07/12/04, Wayne Schlitt, 2004/07/11
"redirect" in an included SPF record, Roger Moser, 2004/07/11
- Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/11
  - Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, wayne, 2004/07/11
    - Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/12
    - Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, wayne, 2004/07/12
    - Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Roger Moser, 2004/07/12
    - Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Re: "redirect" in an included SPF record, wayne, 2004/07/12
Dealing with "legitimate" forgers, Jeffrey Goldberg, 2004/07/11
- Re: Dealing with "legitimate" forgers, Chris Drake, 2004/07/11
spf command-line query utility?, Nick Bartos, 2004/07/11
- Re: spf command-line query utility?, Michael Weiner, 2004/07/11
- Re: spf command-line query utility?, Paul Howarth, 2004/07/11
  - Re: spf command-line query utility?, wayne, 2004/07/11
SPF news from Russia., Serge Orlov, 2004/07/11
Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/10
- Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/07/10
  - Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
    - Re[2]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/11
    - Re: Re[2]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/11
    - Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Chris Drake, 2004/07/11
    - Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Jim Paris, 2004/07/11
    - Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Andrew G. Tereschenko, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Re[4]: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and delivery notification ?, Roger Moser, 2004/07/12
    - Re: Is there is proposed checks on bounces and deliv