Re: [fetchmail]RFC2821 Return-Path

On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:54:51 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" <esr(_at_)thyrsus(_dot_)com> wrote:

> Jonathan Hudson <jonathan(_at_)daria(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>:
> > I assume a more complete solution would involve rewriting
> > rfc822.c/reply_hack. 
> I've applied this patch.  I'll accept a parallel one for
reply_hack().

Oh dear. You asked for it. Ugly as hell, but "works for me" (modulo
the 5.8.14 no bouce feature).

--- rfc822.c.~1~        Sat Jul  7 18:04:07 2001
+++ rfc822.c    Tue Jul 31 22:00:37 2001
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
                    last_nws = *from;
                if (*from == '<')
                    state = 3;
-               else if (*from == '@')
+               else if (*from == '@' || *from == '!')
                    has_host_part = TRUE;
                else if (*from == '"')
                    state = 2;
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
                break;
 
            case 3:     /* we're in a <>-enclosed address */
-               if (*from == '@')
+               if (*from == '@' || *from == '!')
                    has_host_part = TRUE;
                else if (*from == '>' && from[-1] != '<')
                {