I wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
which does not have the 'for" clause in netsrvr's header. However, it
has worked with the UML account I created here:
[from the user-mode-linux-admin list]
Received: from usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252])
by netsrvr.ami.com.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f94ExxJ02092
for <uml(_at_)summer(_dot_)ami(_dot_)com(_dot_)au>; Thu, 4 Oct 2001
22:59:59 +0800
Sorry, that was still the user-mode-linux-user list, not a
user-mode-linux-admin list. But the difference between this one and
the one on the same list without "for" is that this one goe's through
summer.ami.com.au instead of netsrvr.ami.com.au.
The answer is simple. Someone else getting mail through
netsrvr.amu.com.au subscribed to user-mode-linux-user in August.
s/amu.com.au/ami.com.au/
--
==============================| Guildenstern: "So there you are."
Rob Funk <rfunk(_at_)funknet(_dot_)net> | Rosencrantz: "Stark raving sane."
http://www.funknet.net/rfunk |(Tom Stoppard, Ros. & Guil. Are Dead)