Re: Richmail1991-05-31 10:35:37
Nathaniel,
I'd like to see RICHMAIL defined in a separate RFC, one that
defines a new sub-type using the standard extension mechanism. It would
be a useful extension to the protocol, but only an extension.
I vote for SIMPLE SIMPLE SIMPLE and let the non-critical extensions be
included in another document.
Greg V.
|
|
||||||||||||||||