Re: non-ASCII in headers


Why do you always bring up irrelevancies?  Is it merely to obfuscate the
issue?  Or is there a hidden agenda.


How clever. Yes, I hope to kill the RFC-XXXX effort so X.500 will succeed.
It is only when running the full OSI protocol suite that an '86 chip with
640K of RAM truly outshines all other computing devices.

yours for a completed RFC-XXXX,
leo j mclaughlin iii
ljm(_at_)ftp(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: non-ASCII in headers, (continued) Re: non-ASCII in headers, feldmark Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii Re: non-ASCII in headers, Mark Crispin Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii Re: non-ASCII in headers, Neil Katin Re: non-ASCII in headers, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD) Re: non-ASCII in headers, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: non-ASCII in headers, Dave Crocker Re: non-ASCII in headers, henry Re: non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin Re: non-ASCII in headers, leo j mclaughlin iii <= Re: non-ASCII in headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster

Previous by Date:	Re: non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin
Next by Date:	Re: non-ASCII in headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster
Previous by Thread:	Re: non-ASCII in headers, John C Klensin
Next by Thread:	Re: non-ASCII in headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]