Re: plain-text checksums considered useless

If you put a checksum in the spec at all, please require it. If it's
optional, I doubt very many people will implement it, and how else are
we going to catch all those gateways which are messing with messages?

        Erik E. Fair    apple!fair      fair(_at_)apple(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: content-charset & checksums, (continued) Re: content-charset & checksums, Greg Vaudreuil Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: content-charset & checksums, Mark Crispin Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: content-charset & checksums, Nathaniel Borenstein plain-text checksums considered useless, henry Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Erik E. Fair <= more content-charset, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: more content-charset, Nathaniel Borenstein

Previous by Date:	Re: checksums (was: content-charset & checksums), Dave Crocker
Next by Date:	encodings, base-64, etc., henry
Previous by Thread:	Re: plain-text checksums considered useless, Nathaniel Borenstein
Next by Thread:	more content-charset, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]