Re: New type suggested: Multipart/Related1993-05-23 14:31:35Well, I for one did not think the Content-disposition approach cleaner. (obviously....) On the DAG issue, I seem to be somewhat clueless: How is it possible to have a containment hierarchy that is not a DAG? In hypertext, you obviously want to be able to go in circles, but I did not think that all possible relationships between body parts were covered by either Content-disposition or Mainpart=. Looking forward to your draft (since I do not understand the Content-disposition). Harald A
|
|