Re: Re[2]: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher

I suggest IETF-ACK(_at_)ics(_dot_)uci(_dot_)edu as the proper place to discuss
adding ACKs to SMTP (or whatever level it can be added at).

It already contains a number of people who are interested, and has been
eerily quiet of late.

                     Harald Tveit Alvestrand

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, (continued) Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Keith Moore Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Dave Crocker Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Steve Dorner Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Keith Moore Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Keith Moore Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Mark Keasling CTE: Compressed-Base64 (Was: Massive Content-Type definition), Greg Vaudreuil Re: CTE: Compressed-Base64 (Was: Massive Content-Type definition), John C Klensin Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Jim Conklin Re[2]: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, CHRIS R BARTRAM Re: Re[2]: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <= Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Massive Content-Type definition ideas & Gopher, Nathaniel Borenstein