Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard

Tony,
the difference= is a parameter to the content-type, not a header.

therefore, it should not need to have a Content- prefix.

          Harald A

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, (continued) Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Tim Goodwin Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Erik . Huizer Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Masataka Ohta Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Mr Rhys Weatherley Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Masataka Ohta Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, hansen Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand <= Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Tim Berners-Lee Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Olle Jarnefors Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Olle Jarnefors Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Olle Jarnefors