Re: Initial comments on draft-ietf-822ext-mime-imb-001994-06-28 19:53:32At 8:03 AM 6/27/94, Nathaniel Borenstein wrote:It is interesting, however, to put these two threads together. Since everything after the = signs is ignored, we could conceivably define a backwards-compatible extension to base64 in which there *was* a checksum at the end, where older decoders will just ignore it.....Yum! That would be very nice for one-pass senders like me. Am I forced to use base64 for MD5 even with a fully-8-bit-transparent reliable transport? Masataka Ohta
|
|