Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header

ietf-822

Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header

1995-01-17 09:15:37

At 4:11 PM 1/13/95, Ned Freed wrote:

I'm not sure I see why it would need a filename. However, if you think
this is a useful case, why not just remove the language about main bodies
completely?


Because I'm afraid that some people will flag it as being illegal unless I
specifically say it's ok.

--
Steve Dorner, Qualcomm Incorporated.  "Oog make mission statement."

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Roger Fajman Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Ned Freed Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Terry Crowley Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Rens Troost Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Rens Troost Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Ned Freed Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Roger Fajman Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Steve Dorner <= Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Ned Freed

Previous by Date:	Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Ned Freed
Next by Date:	Re: quoted-phrase in content-disposition header, Steve Dorner
Previous by Thread:	Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Roger Fajman
Next by Thread:	Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Ned Freed
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]