Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header

ietf-822

Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header

1995-01-17 09:31:37

I'm not sure I see why it would need a filename. However, if you think
this is a useful case, why not just remove the language about main bodies
completely?

Because I'm afraid that some people will flag it as being illegal unless I
specifically say it's ok.


Then say its OK, rather than saying its meaning is undefined.

                                Ned

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Roger Fajman Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Ned Freed Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Terry Crowley Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Rens Troost Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Rens Troost Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Ned Freed Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Roger Fajman Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Steve Dorner Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Ned Freed <=

Previous by Date:	Re: quoted-phrase in content-disposition header, Steve Dorner
Next by Date:	Re: quoted-phrase in content-disposition header, Rens Troost
Previous by Thread:	Re: MIME's 'Content-Disposition' Header, Steve Dorner
Next by Thread:	quoted-phrase in content-disposition header, Keith Moore
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]