At 00/03/20 22:06 -0800, ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)innosoft(_dot_)com wrote:
> now you're moving from the realm of specifying 'features' or
> 'default handling' of the object into specifying layered encodings.
> and this was something that we were very unwilling to do when
> we defined MIME. The feeling was that having an arbitrary
> number of cascaded encodings was likely to be detrimental to
> interoperability.
I thought this too until I realized these were simply strawman names in
Martin's example.
Exactly. Sorry for not having been clear enough.
Regards, Martin.