ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt

2002-01-31 17:27:58

   Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:44:58 -0500 (EST)
   From: Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
[...]
   what you seem to be wanting is for IETF to bless nonstandard practices
   for a widely-used, critical service that is sensitive to disruption -
   or at least, for IETF to make such practices appear "equal" to standards.
   I think that would counterproductive to IETF's purpose.

We don't want the IETF to "bless" nonstandard practices.  We just want
a useful registry that helps people in implementation and prevents
standardization of fields that have already been used for a different
meaning.

Larry


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>