ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Message Header Field Registry - revised proposal

2002-02-21 12:18:06

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam [mailto:sroberts(_at_)uniserve(_dot_)com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:23 AM

I see the split as between "standardized" and 
"informational", where I'd like to be able to find 
information on headers I see in the wild that aren't 
standardized and likely should be shunned.

I definitely prefer "Informational" to "Proprietary".

-- jeff