Keith, I usually agree with you, but not in this case. This suggested
content-type DOES describe the content type: it IS a zip-compressed file
that's enclosed there. It just happens that you also know what was
compressed.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
Keith Moore wrote:
So, I suggested:
content-type: application/x-zip-compressed; encapsulates=application/pdf
sorry, this is just unacceptable. there are too many things (e.g. mail
filters) that expect the content-type to actually describe the content.