Re: drums2?

> > choice #2 loses big time.
> Keith, et al,
>
> Big time enough to prompt me to suggest that we adhere to Pete's
> suggestion, namely that we decline to pursue this topic further, until
> there is a demonstration of a) substantially more support for such a
> massive change, and b) enough detail concerning the proposal to be able to
> assess the likely damage.
Pete's suggestion was a good one.

Keith