In
<138AA78F80DCE84B8EE424399FFBF9C904F8FD(_at_)exchange(_dot_)ad(_dot_)skymv(_dot_)com>
"Dan Kohn" <dan(_at_)dankohn(_dot_)com> writes:
Graham, given that RFC 1700 was obsoleted by RFC 3232, I question the
whole need for an archival RFC, that is by definition almost instantly
out of date.
Eh? That is not what is proposed.
What we have (at IETF Last Call stage) in an RFC that creates the registry.
There is no suggestion that the contents of the registry form an RFC at
any stage, though we do have various drafts (some of them with the status
of internet-drafts, but that is only a convenience) as to what its initial
contents should be.
I would presume that Graham will work with IANA to feed that information
to them in some agreed format.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clw(_dot_)cs(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5
Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5