Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar

blilly(_at_)verizon(_dot_)net wrote:

> a) 822 (as amended by RFC 2047 section 5 and as further amended by RFC 
> 2231) had it,
>    though spread out over three documents
Correction:
2047 and 2231 are also amended by the errata page, so that's a total of 
4 documents.