IETF 822 (date)

IETF 822 (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

January 30, 2004

Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (obs-utext and unstructured), Bruce Lilly, 18:06

January 26, 2004

Re: cryptographically verifiable fields, Bruce Lilly, 14:30

January 25, 2004

Re: X-* header fields, Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:50
Re: X-* header fields, Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:50

January 24, 2004

New mail-ng mailing list open for sign-ups, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 14:35
Re: making mail traceable, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:31

January 23, 2004

Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 12:06
Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 10:37
Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 10:30
Re: X-* header fields, Charles Lindsey, 10:12
Re: X-* header fields, Bruce Lilly, 07:54
Re: X-* header fields, Paul Smith, 07:50
Re: X-* header fields, Bruce Lilly, 06:33
Re: X-* header fields, Bruce Lilly, 06:19
Re: X-* header fields, Paul Smith, 04:31
Re: X-* header fields, Paul Smith, 04:30
Re: X-* header fields, Paul Smith, 04:30

January 22, 2004

Re: X-* header fields, Keith Moore, 20:51
Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 20:23
Re: X-* header fields, Keith Moore, 19:47
Re: X-* header fields, Al Costanzo, 18:22
Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 18:09
Re: X-* header fields, Dave Crocker, 17:43
Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 11:52
Re: X-* header fields, Keith Moore, 10:46

January 21, 2004

Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 19:51
Re: X-* header fields, pbdlists, 16:50
Re: cryptographically verifiable fields, Bruce Lilly, 15:43
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Bruce Lilly, 15:14
Re: cryptographically verifiable fields, James M Galvin, 12:41
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 12:26
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 12:10
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 11:13
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Claus Färber, 11:09
Re: Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 10:59
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 10:53
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 10:50
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 10:50
Re: making mail traceable, Markus Stumpf, 10:26
Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo, 06:36
Re: making mail traceable, Bruce Lilly, 06:06
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Bruce Lilly, 05:38
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Graham Klyne, 04:14
Re: making mail traceable, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:10

January 20, 2004

Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Charles Lindsey, 20:12
Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo, 14:38

January 19, 2004

Re: making mail traceable, Bruce Lilly, 21:27
Re: cryptographically verifiable fields, Bruce Lilly, 19:39
Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo, 19:31
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 16:31
Re: making mail traceable, Markus Stumpf, 16:15
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 16:00
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 15:57
Re: making mail traceable, Nathaniel Borenstein, 15:41
Re: making mail traceable, Markus Stumpf, 14:41
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 13:03
Re: making mail traceable, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:44
Re: making mail traceable, william, 11:21
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:08
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 10:49
Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo, 10:40
Re: Re: making mail traceable, Dave Crocker, 10:34
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 10:30
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 10:19
Re: cryptographically verifiable fields, James M Galvin, 10:17
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 10:17
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 10:03
Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo, 10:03
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 09:52
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 09:38
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 09:17
Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo, 09:06
Re: Will case of non-ascii character be preserved by IDNA?, Simon Josefsson, 08:11
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Claus Färber, 07:40
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 07:33
Re: Will case of non-ascii character be preserved by IDNA?, Adam M. Costello, 06:52
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly, 06:15
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Bruce Lilly, 05:54
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly, 05:42
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Charles Lindsey, 05:12
Re: cryptographically verifiable fields, Charles Lindsey, 05:12
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Charles Lindsey, 05:12
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (obs-utext), Charles Lindsey, 05:12
Re: Will case of non-ascii character be preserved by IDNA?, Charles Lindsey, 05:12
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Charles Lindsey, 05:12
Re: cryptographically verifiable fields, Bruce Lilly, 05:11
Re: making mail traceable, Graham Klyne, 02:40

January 18, 2004

Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Pete Resnick, 15:35
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Russ Allbery, 14:10
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Russ Allbery, 14:00
Re: cryptographically verifiable fields, Keith Moore, 13:40
Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 10:15
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:05
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:02
Re: X-* header fields, Bruce Lilly, 09:21
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (quoted-pair), Bruce Lilly, 07:45
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly, 06:56
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (quoted-pair), Adam M. Costello, 06:29
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Russ Allbery, 05:14
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly, 04:45
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (quoted-pair), Bruce Lilly, 03:52
cryptographically verifiable fields, Bruce Lilly, 03:15
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (quoted-pair), Adam M. Costello, 00:37

January 17, 2004

Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 23:32
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 23:12
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 23:08
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Russ Allbery, 18:23
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), ned+ietf-822, 17:32
Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo, 15:09
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 14:11
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 13:55
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 13:51
Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:59
Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Bruce Lilly, 10:47
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly, 10:29
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Keith Moore, 09:47
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 09:46
Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Keith Moore, 09:44
Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Bruce Lilly, 09:36
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (date), Bruce Lilly, 07:51
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Bruce Lilly, 07:46
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly, 07:36
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (quoted-pair), Bruce Lilly, 07:05

January 16, 2004

Re: Will case of non-ascii character be preserved by IDNA?, Adam M. Costello, 22:39
Re: Will case of non-ascii character be preserved by IDNA?, Simon Josefsson, 19:56
Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo, 17:42
Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore, 15:22
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 15:02
some message bullet-proofing, Dave Crocker, 14:46
Re: making mail traceable, Dave Crocker, 14:43
Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin, 14:30
Will case of non-ascii character be preserved by IDNA?, Jacob Palme, 11:25
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:16
making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Keith Moore, 09:47
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (quoted-pair), Pete Resnick, 09:32
Received header Considered Pathetic (was Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (scratching the surface of Received issues)), Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:55
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (obs-utext), Bruce Lilly, 06:31
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Charles Lindsey, 05:12
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (scratching the surface of Received issues), Bruce Lilly, 04:42
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:24
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (obs-time-of-day), Bruce Lilly, 01:11
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (ASCII NUL), Bruce Lilly, 00:55
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (quoted-pair), Bruce Lilly, 00:44

January 15, 2004

Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Pete Resnick, 22:07
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Pete Resnick, 21:26
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Charles Lindsey, 20:12
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:09

January 12, 2004

Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:46
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Charles Lindsey, 05:12

January 10, 2004

Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Pete Resnick, 16:12

January 07, 2004

Re: X-* header fields, Russ Allbery, 21:41
Re: X-* header fields, ned+ietf-822, 11:01
Re: X-* header fields, Charles Lindsey, 05:12

January 06, 2004

Re: X-* header fields, Keith Moore, 16:12
Re: X-* header fields, Russ Allbery, 15:39
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, John C Klensin, 09:57
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Bruce Lilly, 07:21
Re: X-* header fields, Keith Moore, 06:13
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:38
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Paul Smith, 02:30
Re: X-* header fields, Kai Henningsen, 02:26
Re: X-* header fields, Bruce Lilly, 01:24
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Bruce Lilly, 00:19

January 05, 2004

Re: X-* header fields, Bruce Lilly, 22:34
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Keith Moore, 15:02
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), ned+ietf-822, 11:08
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Charles Lindsey, 10:13
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Charles Lindsey, 10:12

January 04, 2004

Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Keith Moore, 22:21
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Adam M. Costello, 18:36
Re: X-* header fields, Kai Henningsen, 15:24
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Pete Resnick, 11:12
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Pete Resnick, 10:10
Re: Getting RFC 2047 encoding right, Bruce Lilly, 02:37
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Bruce Lilly, 00:55

January 03, 2004

Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Bruce Lilly, 23:47
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Bruce Lilly, 23:43
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, blilly, 22:35
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), ned+ietf-822, 19:42
Re: X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12:02
X-* header fields (Was: Getting 2822 to Draft), Pete Resnick, 10:40
Re: Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Dave Crocker, 10:05
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Pete Resnick, 09:35
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Keith Moore, 09:19
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Al Costanzo, 09:00

January 02, 2004

Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Kurt Keller, 17:51
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Keith Moore, 14:02
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Pete Resnick, 13:57
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Keith Moore, 13:53
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Pete Resnick, 13:37
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Pete Resnick, 13:29
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Keith Moore, 09:55
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, WJCarpenter, 09:52
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:21
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Keith Moore, 09:14
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Simon Josefsson, 08:57
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Al Costanzo, 08:20
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Keith Moore, 08:06
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Keith Moore, 08:02
Re: Getting 2822 to Draft, Simon Josefsson, 05:40

January 01, 2004

Getting 2822 to Draft, Pete Resnick, 21:26