Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar

Personally I see no reason to place any limit on the number of digits 
in the year, but would not object to anything that took us past the 
expected heat death of the universe.  However, I do think a four digit 
limitation would be pointlessly short-sighted.  -- Nathaniel
On Monday, January 19, 2004, at 07:53  AM, Bruce Lilly wrote:

> Charles Lindsey wrote:
>
> > So you can a year with 17 digits in it? I don't think that is a good 
> > idea.
> Pete didn't want to have to revise the document in the year 9999 :-).