[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar

2004-01-19 11:08:30

Personally I see no reason to place any limit on the number of digits in the year, but would not object to anything that took us past the expected heat death of the universe. However, I do think a four digit limitation would be pointlessly short-sighted. -- Nathaniel

On Monday, January 19, 2004, at 07:53  AM, Bruce Lilly wrote:

Charles Lindsey wrote:

So you can a year with 17 digits in it? I don't think that is a good idea.

Pete didn't want to have to revise the document in the year 9999 :-).