Re: making mail traceable

ietf-822

Re: making mail traceable

2004-01-19 10:49:12

I agree with you on this 100%.

The exact location may be a disaster to publish but precision of the RR
record is configurable.

You could just list the Country or Country & State or Country & State &
City.

you've obviously never known someone well who was stalked by hernutcase ex-husband.


Keith

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), (continued) Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Bruce Lilly Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Nathaniel Borenstein Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin Re: making mail traceable, Graham Klyne Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore <= Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo Re: making mail traceable, Bruce Lilly Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo Re: making mail traceable, Bruce Lilly Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Keith Moore Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), ned+ietf-822 Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Russ Allbery

Previous by Date:	Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo
Next by Date:	Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar, Nathaniel Borenstein
Previous by Thread:	Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo
Next by Thread:	Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]