|
Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field)
2004-01-17 09:47:45
IMO, Subject should be unstructured, period. Unfortunately, RFC 1036
introduced two
hacks:
Usenet is not email, and email should not be expected to inherit every
feature (or mistake) of Usenet.
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: making mail traceable, (continued)
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field),
Keith Moore <=
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), ned+ietf-822
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Russ Allbery
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Russ Allbery
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Russ Allbery
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Pete Resnick
- Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar (Subject field), Bruce Lilly
|
|
|