Re: making mail traceable
2004-01-19 07:33:59
But do we really want traceability? Or to put it another way, do we
really want to put hooks in the mail system that make mass
surveillance (by governments, or perhaps even by large companies or
unscrupulous ISPs) that much easier?
Speaking for myself, I really would like the option to not use
bandwidth receiving email from previously unknown senders unless its
source can be traced.
well I suppose you could say that the reason I'm publicly discussing
these ideas now is that spam has gotten bad enough that extreme
measures seem to be required.
also, earlier versions of this scheme made surveillance easier than the
one I just proposed.
Keith
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: making mail traceable, (continued)
- Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin
- Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Bruce Lilly
- Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Keith Moore
- Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Bruce Lilly
- Re: making mail traceable (was Re: Received header Considered Pathetic), Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: making mail traceable, James M Galvin
- Re: making mail traceable, Graham Klyne
- Re: making mail traceable,
Keith Moore <=
- Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo
- Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore
- Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo
- Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore
- Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo
- Re: making mail traceable, Keith Moore
- Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo
- Re: making mail traceable, Bruce Lilly
- Re: making mail traceable, Al Costanzo
- Re: making mail traceable, Bruce Lilly
|
|
|